I am pretty sure that the answer is high-power distance
The answer is B.farming communities
Answer:
A. Jack is making a(n) <u>internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior, whereas John is making a(n) <u>external attribution</u>.
Explanation:
An internal attribution refers to a situation in which <u>an individual uses a personal reason to explain the outcome of a situation</u>. For example, a specific behavior is the result of the person's personality.
On the other hand, an external attribution refers to the situation when <u>the individual attributes a result to an external situation or environmental factor</u>, not to the person's characteristics. For example, when you fail an exam and you blame an external factor, such as the teacher or the weather.
In this case, <u>Jack is making an internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior because he thinks she broke up with him because she is selfish; whereas <u>John is making an external attribution</u> because he thinks his girlfriend broke up with him because she had a family emergency to attend.
we know that
According to Sigmund Freud, the principle of reality is what prevents doing something that is not correct.
To understand the principle of reality, it is important to have an idea of how the two personality components identified by Freud work. The ID seeks to satisfy the initial desire. It is governed by the pleasure principle: the idea that impulses must be fulfilled immediately.
The ego, on the other hand, is the component of the personality that ensures that the desires of identification are satisfied in an effective and appropriate manner; In other words, the ego is governed by the principle of reality.
The ego does not try to block an impulse, but, on the contrary, it works to make sure that the wishes of the id are fulfilled in a safe, realistic and appropriate way.
therefore
the answer is
According to Freud, asking to earn the money comes from the ego, which provides a compromise solution that reflects the reality principle
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
