Answer:
reduce output
Explanation:
The marginal cost ($26) is greater than the marginal revenue ($25). In order to maximise profit, marginal cost should he reduced up to the point where marginal cost equals marginal benefit.
A firm should shutdown, reduce production to zero if average variable cost is greater than price but in this question, the firm shouldn't shut down since price ($25) is greater than average variable cost ($24).
I hope my answer helps you
The form of customer communication here is what is referred to as delivery status.
Given the FedEx tracking number that Alton has received, he would be able to get a customized and an in-depth tracking of the NFL jersey that he has ordered for his son.
The availability of a tracking number would also help to build his faith and confidence in the delivery service. This is because it is going to give him a timeline of his good that would help him to anticipate the delivery.
Read more on brainly.com/question/7146441?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The corporation's tax liability is $ 228,820.
Explanation:
To calculate tax liability we first have to find net profit. Detail calculation is given below.
<u><em>Net profit Calculation</em></u>
Sales $ 3,130,000
cost of goods sold and the operating expenses ($ 2,080,000)
Interest expense ( $ 377,000)
Net profit $ 673,000
<u><em>Tax liability Calculation</em></u>
Income fall under Tax bracket of 34% ($75,001 to $10,000,0000 for corporate tax. No additional surtax will be charged as income do not fall under its net.
Tax liabilty = 673,000 * 34% = $ 228,820
Answer:
The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.
Explanation:
Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.
Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.
Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.
Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.
Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).
However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.
I think that answer is 1.5
