Answer:
The Renaissance was a period of rebirth.
From 1350 to 1550 in Europe, arts, literature, and sciences flourished. It was a stark contrast to the blatant ignorance of people during the Middle Ages, just one era before. During the Renaissance, people started to seek out knowledge beyond just the information the religious leaders had been spewing them.
Many of the greatest artists we still revere now worked during that time, including Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci.
Answer:
The correct answer is
d. 3,000
Explanation:
In order to have an acceptable justification about the fires in the gas tanks Ford said that for the Standard 301 fires were a minimal problem. Because of this, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - NHTSA was responsible for carrying out several studies independently where they found that the number of fires in cars was 400,000 per year and that of this number 3.000 led to the death of its occupants.
As a result of using only their friends in the newspaper survey, the journalism student's research will not be generalizable due to the data being tainted by b. Sampling bias.
Sampling bias:
- Refers to a scenario where certain members of a population have more or less of a chance of being selected for a sample.
- Is dangerous because the data is not representative of the population and so cannot be applied generally.
Sampling should be random which gives everyone in the relevant population a chance to be selected so that whatever conclusions are drawn, can be applied to that population with a better chance of it being applicable.
In conclusion, because the journalism students, did not make the sampling random, the sample they came up with is biased and cannot be accurately applied to the school population.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/12428281.</em>
<em />
The options for this question are:
a. A lack of debriefing
b. Sampling bias
c. Participant bias
d. Social desirability bias
e. Placebo effects
Answer: I believe its true.
You might want more than my answer to confirm but again, I believe its true
Explanation:
<span>Classical conditioning could account for how a child learns to "fear the dark".
</span>
Classical conditioning alludes to a learning system in which a biologically potent stimulus(e.g. sustenance) is combined with a formerly unbiased boost (we can take food as an example). It additionally alludes to the taking in process that outcomes from this matching, through which the neutral stimulus comes to evoke a reaction that is normally like the one inspired by the strong stimulus.