Not in the “environmental “ concept, but they could in a work setting concept.
Example-clean drinking water for employees or air filtration at a plant—- yes
Water issues 70 miles away unrelated to their plant. No
Answer:
Was it breached if the neighbor sells it to someone else for $100 more?
Answer:
It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.
In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.
That's it you need to know!
Hope it helps you mate!
The best option that supports how the information that Lobbyists provides is that lobbyists can present information in a way that supports their clients’ positions.
The lobbyist can be described as a person that does the job of convincing legislatures and politicians on voting in a particular way.
Lobbyists are able to represent the views of people. They take the views to the legislators for consideration.
Read more on brainly.com/question/10791090?referrer=searchResults
Answer: I think that the rule is very wrong and it is very foolish.
I think that if someone is breaking the law, we should be able to provide all the evidence we need to put this thief behind bars.
If nobody recorded, how else would the evidence get to the police?
If nobody recorded, the thief can say that he did not steal anything.
The Police and the Supreme Court need to have evidence that way there is no confusion and that way there is not anymore trouble.
Explanation:
