<span>From the monopolist points of view the benefits are, holding 100% of the market, the ability to have a great influence on price and of course, no competition.
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
</span>
Answer:
-$475,000
Explanation:
Total revenue = Baskets of peaches × Price
= 100,000 × $3
= $300,000
Explicit cost:
= Rent equipment + wages
= $100,000 + $100,000
= $200,000
Implicit cost:
= Land × Interest + salesman earned
= $1,000,000 × 0.55 + $25,000
= $575,000
Total cost = Explicit cost: + Implicit cost
= $200,000 + $575,000
= $775,000
Economic profit = Total revenue - Total cost
= $300,000 - $775,000
= -$475,000
Explanation:
1. The ceterus paribus effect gives us to what extent, the effect of a variable has on another variable, while holding all other factors fixed. Analysing job training of workers on productivity will give us results that are not biased since we will not be taking account of other factor variables in the calculations. When 2 firms are the same in almost every aspect apart from number of hours on training, then we will find out that each firm would have different levels of workers output. So we should know if workers output increases due to job training.
2. When it comes to provision of training, furms do these based on characteristics of the workers. Some of these characteristics are measurable while some are immeasurable
Measurable:
Experience on the job,
Productivity
Level of education,
immeasurable :
Skill set
Vision
Likeliness to bstay at firm
3. Apart from worker characteristics, productivity also depends on other factors one of which is technological change. A technological change can bring about increased efficiency and greater output by the worker. Different firms using different capital and technological combination are quite likely to have different output levels.
4. A positive correlation between job training and productivity cannot be used to ascertain if job training makes worker more efficient this is due to the fact that correlation only tells us if variables are in coexistence. So a positive correlation does not tell us that job training is indeed bringing about changes in the productivity of workers.
Answer:
The amount that Plunkett should report in ending inventory on December 31 is $156,300
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory is shown below:
= Ending inventory balance - FOB destination goods purchased - goods being held on consignment
= $215,500 - $44,100 - $15,100
= $156,300
The other items would not be adjusted because the other items are not included in the ending inventory so they are not being considered in the computation part.
