The correct answer would be, Compromise.
After a lengthy discussion, it was decided that the budget would be hired for the next year. In this situation, Compromise strategy of conflict management is used.
Explanation:
In simple words, Conflict Management is the management of Conflict between two parties, or between two issues. In this process, the negative aspects of the issue are lowered while positive aspects are being highlighted.
Compromise is that strategy of Conflict Management in which a settlement is made below the desired standards in order to resolve the conflict.
So when temporary faculty is hired in the school instead of the need of permanent faculty, due to the shortage of budget, Compromise Strategy of Conflict Management is being used.
Learn more about Conflict Management at:
brainly.com/question/12441613
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Catering's 2008 EBIT is $11.47 million
Explanation:
Operating cash flow = EBIT + Depreciation – Taxes
Also the same as EBIT = Operating cash flow - Depreciation + Taxes
When Operating cash flow = Free cash flows + Investment in operating capital
OCF =
$8.14 million + $2.14 m
illion
Operating cash flow = 10.28 million
EBIT = Operating cash flow - Depreciation + Taxes
EBIT = 10.28 million - 0.95 million + 2.1
4 million
EBIT = $11.47 million
Catering's 2008 EBIT is $11.47 million
The answer is 562.754405
The total amount she will have to pay back in four years is. 562.754405
Answer:
General; limited; limited.
Explanation:
Limited partnerships have two classes of partners. These two (2) classes are;
1. General partner: it is a type of partnership in which two or more people come together and have an agreement to do business by sharing profits, assets, debts or financial and legal liabilities.
2. Limited partner: it is a type of partnership in which people come together and have an agreement to do business but the involved partners only contribute financially and solely responsible to the amount of money they invested.
Hence, the general partner actually runs the business and faces unlimited liability for the firm's debt, while the limited partner is only liable up to the amount the limited partner invested.
