1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uranmaximum [27]
3 years ago
13

A positive result that stems from the use of return on investment (ROI) is that it encourages managers to focus on the efficient

use of resources in generating income. operating asset efficiency. cost efficiency. the relationship among sales, expenses, and investment. All of these.
Business
1 answer:
qwelly [4]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

All of these.

Explanation:

The formula to compute the return on investment is as follows:

Return on investment = Net operating income ÷ Average operating assets

Here the return on investment means it calculates the manager performance that motivates them to rise the net operating income via cost efficiency also at the same time the average operating assets could be maintained at the normal level so that the operational efficiency could be accomplished

Therefore the last option is correct

You might be interested in
Managers in international businesses will need to evaluate the attractiveness of a country as a market or location for a facilit
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer: Please refer to Explanation

Explanation:

When Evaluating a country's attractiveness for investment, there are several factors that should be evaluated. Key amongst them are, Benefits, Costs and Risks.

Under Benefits, the economy is evaluated based on the benefits it brings to the table. It's strengths and Opportunities. The goal is to see if these benefits present the company with adequate enough incentives to want to invest.

Under Costs, the cost of setting up and thriving is evaluated. What does the company have to pay and who do they have to pay it to in order to set up properly.

Under Threats, the factors that could adversely affect the company as a result of Investing in the country are evaluated. This is very important to know so that if need be, contingencies can be established.

Classifying the above.

1. Middle-class population growth potential. EVALUATE BENEFITS.

The middle class are the main purchasers of goods and services in the economy. In evaluating benefits the potential growth rate of the middle class should be evaluated.

2. First-mover advantages. EVALUATE BENEFITS.

Evaluating the potential benefits to be had from investing first in a country is part of Benefits Evaluation.

3. Bribe payments. EVALUATE COSTS.

Bribery payments are a cost when it comes to setting up in corrupt nations. They need to be evaluated as costs.

4. Unexpected political change. EVALUATE RISKS.

Under the evaluation of risks, this should be evaluated because a new Political leadership could have a different attitude to the company and this is a threat.

5. Infrastructure issues. EVALUATE COSTS.

Under the evaluation of cost there must be an evaluation of infrastructural issues in the country. If there are infrastructural challenges, the cost of setting up will be higher because depending on the infrastructure you'd have to bring in infrastructure from other areas and that would be expensive.

6. Resolving contract disputes. EVALUATE COSTS.

What are the costs of resolving contract disputes in the country. If they are favourable then the country is fine.

7. Free market economy. EVALUATE BENEFITS.

A free Market Economy is very useful to Entreprise. The type of economy needs to be evaluated therefore to see if it is a Free Market Economy that can benefit the company.

8. Economic uncertainty. EVALUATE RISKS.

How stable is the economy of the country in question. A country with an unstable Economy is one with a lot of Uncertainty and any company going in there will have to risk suffering losses if the Economy goes through peril.

7 0
3 years ago
Assume there are currently five firms producing and selling fertilizer in the South American market. Also assume that the produc
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

It is given that in an oligopolistic market, there are at first five firms. At the point when the quantity of fums diminishes to three, it implies that the all out yield will likewise decrease. It is on the grounds that, all the makers are delivering separated items. The inventory of merchandise won't increment in light of the fact that the makers would have expanded the creation before, if that was conceivable. Hence, the balance amount will fall and in view of decrease in amount, cost will increase.

Thus, equilibrium price will likely <u>increase</u> and the equilibrium quantity will likely  <u>decrease.</u>

3 0
4 years ago
________leads to better quality and lower prices?
Nataly [62]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

because it makes sense in the sentence

5 0
3 years ago
Benson Corporation manufactures car stereos. It is a division of Berna Motors, which manufactures vehicles. Benson sells car ste
Alla [95]

Answer:

Potential loss to the whole corporation = $(60,000)

Explanation:

The Benson  Division is operating at full capacity, hence it has no excess capacity .

This implies that it can not produce enough to meet both demand of  internal and external buyers.

<em>Hence, Benson Division  cannot accommodate the demands of the Berna Division at a price lower than the external price, because it will result to a loss in contribution.</em>

To maximize and optimize the group's profit in this scenario, the minimum transfer should be:

Minimum transfer price = External selling price - savings in selling cost resulting from in internal transfer

= $86-3= 83

Minimum transfer price = $83.

Effect on Group's profit

<em>Any unit transferred at a priced lower than $83 would result in a unit loss to the Benson Division equal to $83 minus the transfer  price.</em>

<em>Any unit transferred to Berna at a price lower that its current purchase cost would save the division an amount equal to the current purchase cost  minus the forced transfer price.</em>

The potential loss to the organization as a whole would be computed as the net effect of the following:

Lost contribution by Benson : The difference between the Minimum transfer price and the transfer imposed by the group company multiplied by the quantity transferred.

Savings made by the Berna Division : The difference between the forced transfer price and current purchase of Berna.

We can summarize the effect of the forced transfer price on the whole corporation as follows:

Lost contribution per unit = 83 - 35= 48 .

Savings made per unit = 80 - 35 = 45

                                                                                       $

Total lost contribution by Benson

(48 × 200,000)                                                         (960,000)            

Savings made by Berna as result of the transfer

(45 × 200,000)                                                          <u>900,000</u>

Potential loss to the group                                       <u> (60,000)</u>

Potential loss to the whole corporation = $(60,000)

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose Russia produces only trucks and cars. The resources that are used in the production of these two goods are not specializ
seraphim [82]

Answer:

Remains constant

Explanation:

Since the same set of resources are useful in producing both cars and trucks, it shows that resources are not specialized hence Russia has a straight line PPC. A straight line (linear) PPC connotes constant returns to scale. In this case, resources are mobile and can easily be reallocated and redirected from the production  of one good to another thus, opportunity cost is constant and so is the marginal rate of transformation (MRT). The MRT is the number of units or amount of a good that must be foregone in order to attain one unit of another.  If Russia decides to produce more cars and fewer trucks, the resources deployed in producing more cars would be well suited as the resources already used in car production. The opportunity cost in producing each additional unit of car remains constant as more cars are produced.

The slope of a linear PPC determines the marginal rate of transformation; that is, a flatter slope would mean producing more cars requires trading-off fewer trucks while a steeper slope would mean that producing more cars requires trading-off more trucks.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Other things the same, during recessions taxes tend to Select one: a. rise. The rise in taxes contracts aggregate demand. b. fal
    11·1 answer
  • According to the aggregate demand curve, when the aggregate price level _____, the quantity of aggregate output _____. rises; de
    11·1 answer
  • The Janissaries were___________.A)slave women who lived in the sultan's harem.B)Christian boys taken from conquered territories
    7·2 answers
  • Many people use mobile apps and online software to manage and create personalized budgets. Suppose your task is to develop an on
    11·1 answer
  • Ratio of 10% and assuming that banks keep no excess reserves, imagine that $300 is deposited into a checking account. by how muc
    15·1 answer
  • Which one of the following is a false statement regarding NYSE specialists? On a stock exchange most buy or sell orders are exec
    7·1 answer
  • Which behavior would most offices consider
    8·1 answer
  • It is now January 1, 2013, and you are considering the purchase of an outstanding bond that was issued on January 1, 2011. It ha
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose the rate of return on short-term government securities (perceived to be risk-free) is about 5%. Suppose also that the ex
    9·1 answer
  • A company has positive cash flows from operating activities, negative cash flows from capital expenditures, and negative cash fl
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!