Answer:
Lineup issues. ...
Visual characteristics
Explanation:
*lineup issues
Witnesses are often asked to identify suspects through lineups, both physical and photographs.
*visual characteristics
Often, witnesses base their identifications off a suspect’s defining features or characteristics.
Answer:
Let them have cheese on their pineapples along with plenty of salt
Explanation:
Answer:
50 minutes.
Explanation:
2018 NHTSA key findings:
■ In 2018 there were 10,511 fatalities in motor vehicle traffic crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher. This totaled 29 percent of all traffic fatalities for the year. (Note: It is illegal in every State to
drive with a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher.)
■ An average of 1 alcohol-impaired-driving fatality occurred every 50 minutes in 2018.
■ The estimated economic cost of all alcohol-impaired crashes (involving alcoholimpaired drivers or alcohol-impaired nonoccupants) in the United States in 2010 (the most recent year for which cost data is available) was $44 billion.
■ Of the 2018 traffic fatalities among children 14 and younger, 22 percent occurred in alcohol-impaired-driving crashes.
■ The 21- to 24-year-old age group had the highest percentage (27%) of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes compared to other age groups in 2018.
■ The percentage of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes in 2018 was highest for motorcycle riders (25%), compared to drivers of passenger cars (21%), light trucks (19%), and large trucks (3%).
■ The rate of alcohol impairment among drivers involved in fatal crashes in 2018 was 3.4 times higher at night than during the day.
■ In 2018 among the 10,511 alcohol-impaired driving fatalities, 67 percent (7,051) were in crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .15 g/dL or higher.
Source: NHTSA 2018 data
Hope that helps
Answer:
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.
Explanation:
Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.
And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.
