Answer:
b) operant conditioning.
Explanation:
In psychology, the term operant conditioning is also referred to as "instrumental conditioning", and is described as one of the different learning methods that generally occurs via punishments and rewards in regards to specific behaviors. Because of this conditioning process, an association or connection is being made between a particular behavior and related consequence of the given behavior.
In the question above, this productivity increases in terms of operant conditioning.
Answer:
Dr. Winstell has used <u>parody participant</u> in her study.
Explanation:
Dr. Winstell is very much aware that, for her study to be successful, she needs to be able to create the impression that what the participants was told is what is actually being done.
<em>This is the reason why he adopted the parody (fake) participants inorder to create the impression that, the participants in the experiment are actually chatting with the African-American as they were initally told.</em>
Ah, the scientific method. Well. Here it is:
1. Ask a question.
Be specific! Define your variables. Tara might like to ask something like “What are the effects of text-messaging rather than talking on the quality of friendships?” But she needs to define what counts as high quality and low quality friendship. Besides, what effects does she mean?
2. Make a hypothesis.
Something like “I believe the more text-messaging involved rather than taking, the lower quality the friendship will be.” Again, she should define her variables better. Make sure to use an independent and dependant variable.
3. Collect data.
Find a way to collect data. Surveys? Interviews? In-field observation? Keep it objective and informative. Remember the Hawthorne effect- don’t get to close to participants if it’s a study.
4. Represent your data.
Some people like using graphs or charts or some sort. Find a simple way to represent the data so it is easily understood.
5. Analyze and conclude
What conclusions can she draw from her research and data? Did it prove her hypothesis correct? If so, how? What else can she say about what she noticed?
There can be more or less official steps depending on your point of view. Some people like to include material lists, or theories, or sources of error. Do what you wish, but the scientific method cannot be used without first asking a question.
The correct answer is C) instruct the reader about a topic.
The purpose of an informative essay is to instruct the reader about a topic.
When an author writes an informative essay, it has to use appropriate and educated language so is clear for the audience to read and understand and have the capacity and knowledge to describe complex topics clearly and straightforwardly.
That is when the author has to consider the following questions.
Is my writing interesting? Am I specifying rather than generalizing? Are my spelling, grammar, and punctuation correct?
The revising process of an informative essay is of the utmost importance in that here is when we are going to double-check that information is correct, that we used proper primary and secondary sources, and edit the information that is not useful.
