1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vanyuwa [196]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following best summarizes the reaction of American Indians to the flow of pioneer settlers into the western United

States? *
A. American Indians avoided the pioneers. They did not want to have any contact with them.
B. American Indians were furious because of the wagon trains. They attacked as many pioneers as they could.
C. American Indians often met the settlers' wagon trains and traded with them. They rarely attacked the pioneers.
D. American Indian groups in the West demanded large payments from the pioneers in exchange for a safe journey.
History
1 answer:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

its number c

Explanation:

indians often met them and were rarely attack.

You might be interested in
Which of the following inferences can you make
garri49 [273]

Answer:women were important to the settlement house movement

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do historians find periodization useful for study of history
kirill [66]
Humans as a species find it a lot easier to consume facts if they're categorized. Therefor, we have time periods for scale and for ease of memory
3 0
3 years ago
Which native American belief differed from European beliefs and caused conflict between the two groups
trasher [3.6K]
The primary Native American belief that differed from European beliefs and caused conflict was that the Natives believed one did not have to farm land in order to own it, whereas the Europeans thought that such undeveloped land was free to take. 
5 0
3 years ago
World War I was fought with new technology. Battles were waged by air, land, and sea. Destructive weapons such as mustard gas an
Akimi4 [234]
A more effective way of killing people. Not only in killing, but killing in greater quantity and depleting the opposing faction's manpower far more quickly than ancient warfare could provide.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the three options Japan had when the United States passed the Japanese Embargo?​
sergejj [24]

Answer: They Could attack pearl harbor

                They could get some materials from their colonies(though most of their materials came from america)

               Or they could have waited.

               

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The women are often described through stage directions rather than through dialogue. How does this reinforce the role of women i
    6·2 answers
  • How did shah abbas help safavid culture flourish?
    15·1 answer
  • Why causes people in today's society to move?
    15·1 answer
  • Which sentence best describes a flat tax?
    7·2 answers
  • What country lies just off the southern tip of malaysia what is that country's capital?
    10·1 answer
  • Was iron used extensively by the sumerians
    15·1 answer
  • According to the preamble, the phrase “a more perfect Union” refers to improving upon a previous attempt at creating a new union
    14·2 answers
  • Which was NOT a cause of the Civil war?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the Berlin Airlift?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of the Iron Cross? Who are some of the famous recipients?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!