Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.
Answer:
They should not be able to successfully negotiate the terms of this loan within these parameters.
Explanation:
It has been provided that RT earns 12% on his current investments and would not like to receive an interest rate of less than 12% on the loan he gives.
if RT gives a loan of $10,000 for one year, he would charge an interest rate of minimum 12%.
Interest = $10,000*0.12
= $1,200
RT requires $1,200 in interest.
It has been provided that Cynthia earns 8% on her investment.
If she borrows $10,000 and invests the amount for one year, she can earn 8% return on such amount.
Earning = $10,000*0.08
= $800
Cynthia is going to earn $800
RT requires a minimum of $1,200 as interest for 1-year loan he gives while Cynthia can pay a maximum of $10,000 as interest for 1-year loan she takes. there is mismatch between the minimum expectation to receive of lender and the maximum expectation to pay of borrower.
Therefore, They should not be able to successfully negotiate the terms of this loan within these parameters.
Answer:
B. $600,000
Explanation:
The computation of the interest expense on the bond for the year 2012 is shown below:
= Interest expense as on 30 June 2012 + interest expense as on December 31 2012
= $300,000 + $300,000
= $600,000
For computing the interest expense for the year 2012, we added the interest expense of June 30 and for December 31 of 2012 only so that the correct amount could come
Answer:
huh i dont understand that question no choosing letter
