The judges are elected in non partisan elections in the whole state.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judges are currently chose in statewide non-fanatic decisions for six-year terms, with any opening filled through an arrangement by the Governor. The primary Chief Justice of the Court was Joseph Henry Lumpkin, who was designated to that position in 1863.
The job of the legal branch is to decipher and apply the law to settle clashes. Find out about the various sorts of courts and the three degrees of courts inside Georgia's legal branch.
Answer:
B. Taken aback/completely/ unjustified
Explanation:
Evelyn and Raymond were TAKEN ABACK when the landlord refused to return their deposit and were COMPLETELY convinced that his action was UNJUSTIFIED.
Evenly and Raymond were taken aback when the landlord refused to return their deposit because they were expecting and positive that he was meant to refund them their money, buh they were surprised about the action of the landlord.
They were completely convinced that his actions was unjustified because what the landlord did wasn't right. The landlord was meant to refund them their deposit, but the landlord doesn't want to do that.
Answer:
1. The equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment is the constitutional provision that was common in both cases.
2. Both cases bordered on issues of segregation. While Brown v Board of Education was a suit by African-American parents against the school board who instituted the separate but equal policy that prevented white and black students from attending the same schools, United States v Virginia was a contest about the gender-biased admissions policy of Virginia Military Institute.
3. Voters who disagree with the holding in United States v Virginia can act to limit its impact by demonstrating "exceedingly persuasive justification" to support their view.
Explanation:
The fourteenth amendment states that, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". This law prohibits segregation on whatever basis. The two cases stated above were clear segregations based on race and gender respectively. In both cases, the supreme court ruled against the segregators.
For voters who wanted to contest the holding of the court, exceedingly persuasive justification was required of them. That was lacking in the defense of the VMI.
Answer:
C. give people anonymity.
Explanation:
Members of a large group typically would not recognize every single members of the group (which resulted in anonymity for some members) . And without actually knowing each other, it is hard to actually act as a collective for the benefit of the whole group.
When we observe our society as a whole, we can definitely say that we belong to one social group. But, the anonymity that we have actually slowly make us feel deattached to the struggle and the needs of other group, which eventually lead to deindividuation.