I believe the answer is: Deductive reasoning
In deductive reasoning, we would collect all the possible explanations of a certain occurrence and started to eliminate which one wouldn't fit to the fact at hand in order to form a certain conclusion. (just like what jason does in making his assumption)
Answer: A. a heuristic
Explanation: Heuristics can be explained as a quick, flexible method employed in problem-solving. Heuristics usually employs a method which could be termed self-discovery as it is a way of getting an answer or solving a problem usually from currently available mental fact within a short time. Results or conclusions made from heuristic approach are not guaranteed to be optimal or perfect but could be enough to provide a verdict required for the short term. Heuristic could be verdicts or conclusions based on intuition, prediction or logical reasoning.
In the scenario above, Bruno attempts to make conclusion using the available mental information available at that current time to make a quick decision which ended up to be incorrect.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>pragmatics </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em><u>Pragmatics,</u></em><em> in psychology, is described as the study of an individual's capability of "natural language speaker" to communicate beyond the factor that has been stated explicitly. An individual's capability to understand and comprehend speaker's or someone else's intended meaning. It encompasses the process through which words have been utilized by a person.</em>
<em><u>As per the question, Donna is demonstrating her grasp of pragmatics.</u></em>
The best answer is C. Pakistan’s government tried to increase gender equality by reserving parliament seats for women. Numerous movements are done by the government to improve gender equality in Pakistan. Some of these reforms are bringing education to woman and limiting polygamy. In fact, during 1988, the first woman president was elected. During her reign, many reforms were done pertaining to equality with men and women.
