Compare the strengths and weaknesses of the Confederation government. Was it doomed to failure? Why?

History

1 answer:

iris [78.8K]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The thirteen American provinces needed a legislature that would supplant the British framework that the states were endeavoring to topple. The Founding Fathers made the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the main authority record of the United States. In Philadelphia, the Articles of Confederation were proposed at the Continental Congress in 1777. With this stated, I will discuss a portion of the shortcomings and qualities of the Confederation government.There are numerous blemishes in the Article of Confederation, for example, Congress couldn't direct exchange and there was no uniform arrangement of cash. The main defect in the Articles of Confederation was that Congress couldn't directly exchange. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress was just ready to manage exchange and business with Native Americans. Since Congress did not be able to arrange an exchange with outside nations, the focal government could underwrite remote bargains; in any case, they couldn't on the grounds that a few settlements were particularly prohibited from policing imports and fares. Since the local government had little power, there was not a ton of coordination between the states. Truly, each state had its own motivation and import and fare arrangements.Another defect in the Articles of Confederation has they had no uniform arrangement of cash. In Article IX of the Articles of Confederation, expressed, "The United States in Congress amassed might have the sole and selective right and energy of managing the composite and estimation of coin struck by their own particular specialist, or by that of the individual State." Although Congress had the privilege to control all types of American cash, the Articles neglected to require a type of money. This would imply that the national government could print cash, at the same time, each state could do it. Therefore, this made exchanging between the states and outside nations troublesome.In spite of the fact that the Articles of Confederation had a few shortcomings, it likewise had a few qualities. The Articles of Confederation was the initial move towards another legislature for the creating country. This is an immensely significant achievement on the grounds that the Colonists had never shaped or composed their own administration. The Articles of Confederation spoke to a first endeavor at the government. It is clear that the Articles were solid with all due respect to decentralized freedom and opportunity turned into the fundamental rule of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation thought of the Northwest Ordinance, enabling the Northwest Territories to have their own particular governments

You might be interested in

why did most indian peoples fight with the french against britain and its american coloists in the french and indian war

Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

The French had a stronger relationship with the Indians. The French sought to hunt and live peacefully with the Indians, whereas the British wanted to take land away from the Indians because the British thought they were not utilizing the land and they were just letting it go to waste.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

One reason some people support raising the eligibility age for receiving social security being is that

netineya [11]

One reason some people support raising the eligibility age for receiving Social Security benefits is that 2. people are living longer today. Social Security is intended to support individuals as they enter the end of their lives meaning they are no longer physically able to provide for themselves. However, with advances in medicine, today's individuals live healthier and longer lives thereby allowing them to work to an older age. Therefore, some believe Social Security should only be accessed once people are unable to work which would be later in life than it was when the bill was passed in the 1930s.

8 0

3 years ago

Which statement describes a similarity between the Iraq War, which began in 2003, and the War in Afghanistan, which began in 200

DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Both wars experienced insurgencies after the ruling regimes were defeated.

Explanation:

The War in Afghanistan began on October 7, 2001, almost a month after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Bush administration accused the Taliban of providing the base of operations for the terrorist group Al Qaeda, which was adjudicated responsibility for the attacks. In December 2001, the Taliban government had been defeated and a new democratic government had been established, but this war lasted until December 2014 with a majority American presence, and from January 2015 to the present, with a gradual decline in American participation, due to to the various insurgent groups of an Islamic extremist nature that continue to operate in the country and pose a threat to the United States.

In turn, the Iraq War began on March 20, 2003, due to accusations by the American government that the Saddam Hussein regime owned or was developing weapons of mass destruction. In this case, the Hussein regime was overthrown and a provisional government was established in May, but the war continued until 2011 due to the presence of different insurgent groups in the area, such as Al Qaeda, the Baathists, or Ansar Al Sunnah. In fact, after 3 years without American participation, in 2014 President Obama had to send forces back to the country, due to the unstable situation of the Iraqi government.

6 0

3 years ago

What modern counties did the mayas cover have

VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

Mexico, Belize, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

A government that has divine right over the people is called a monarchy<br> O True<br> O False

Ganezh [65]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers