Just say stuff about it like how to stop it or why it is happening
In a research study, asking women if they have had an abortion, is an example of when situation and time are key to assessing risk of harm.
<h3>How does risk of harm factor into research?</h3>
The likelihood of danger resulting from a risk of harm must be identified and evaluated by researchers. They need to make sure that the risks are either acceptable given the potential benefits to the person or outweighed by the social and scientific value of the knowledge gathered.
<h3>How can the security of research participants be ensured?</h3>
Advice for safeguarding research subjects:
- Speak with the institution about new protocols.
- Consider each move you make.
- Don't just think about threats within the lab.
- If necessary, update your consent forms.
- Protect research subjects who are not human.
To know more about risk of harm, visit:
brainly.com/question/28791279
#SPJ4
This is an example of recency and primacy bias.
Explanation:
What happened to Terrence is a pretty common occurrence to people who tend to remember things on a list with some form of difficulty as they usually only retain the things in the first part or the end of the list they are being narrated.
This is due to the attention spans of the people who are receiving the information from the other person.
When the person only remembers the first part of any information they are paying more attention in the beginning and this is known as primacy bias.
When the person only retains what they heard the last it is known as recency bias
Answer: Construct Validity
Explanation:
Construct Validity is a measure of how well a test is structured to examine the fact or event we actually want to measure. Put simply, do the variables we are trying to measure and labels we assign them reflect the idea that we intend?
In this question, the threat to construct validity is that black/white does not refer to race but social status due to the culture where the terms are used. The labels used here will translate into a test that measures a completely different idea, and will also generate different results from what is intended.
Hi, You have not informed the problem that your question refers to, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
The only way to answer this question is to understand the problem it is pointing out. For this you must read the full question and identify this issue. Once this is done, you should search your memory for a time when this problem can be seen in your community. If your community has never seen this issue, you can comment on the community of someone you know, but you need to justify this in your response. When telling how the problem was established in the community, you should inform how this problem started, what are the consequences, if it is still in the community, if it was solved and how it was solved.
