Answer:
19th century,labor organizations were not very successful in improving the working conditions and advancing the interest of industrial workers in united states.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Workers formed union.These unions give them immense power.These unions have a leader selected from among the workers only.Leader act as a representative of whole union.These unions can bargain on behalf of all the workers for providing them better working conditions,more wages,bonus.
They used strikes to force the employers to increase wages and provide better working conditions.These unions worked hard to stop child labor,give health benefits and help those workers who got injured .In 19th century trade unions were formed by skilled workers.
Knights of labor was a trade union formed in 1869.It attracted large number of workers and hoped to improve their working conditions.In 1880 skilled labor left Knight of labor and joined American federation of labor.It provides better working conditions.It had 500000 members by 1900.
Despite the efforts unions made less progress in this Era .
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Recommendations.
Explanation:
Evidence-based public health (EBPH) practice is the application, and assessment of effective public health programs and policies by applying scientific reasoning principles. It includes several recommendations on basic practices that should be followed to avoid future medical conditions.
A comparison of the subsidiary accounts to the schedules of accounts payable will help the accountant to <u>A. prove the accounts payable accounts at the end of a period.</u>
<h3>What is a Subsidiary Account?</h3>
A subsidiary account tracks the information of certain transactions in detail. Some of the most important subsidiary accounts include accounts receivable and accounts payable.
Thus, by comparing the subsidiary accounts to the schedules of accounts payable, an accountant proves the existence and completeness of the accounts payable balance at the end of a period.
Learn more about subsidiary accounts here: brainly.com/question/4656883
<span>This would show that Will does not have a homothetic preference for hamburgers. Such preferences are shown to not be effected by income or scale, and since Will has changed his eating preferences based upon this new source of income, such a description would not fit this good.</span>
An unexpected result is examined a lot more closely, since it must disagree with some currently accepted theory to be accepted as unexpected. If something is expected, we generally don't question it, although this is sometimes a tragic mistake and may cost a lot more for a person.