1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad1618 [11]
3 years ago
5

Sally has a decision to make about what she will do in the next 2 years. She can go to school or go straight into the work force

. If Sally immediately starts working she will eam 20,000 both years and 2. If she goes to school in year 1 she must pay \$5,000, , but she would eam in year 2. If the interest rate is 5%, calculate the present value for Sally if she goes to school and if she does not. Does the investment in school make sense? Does it make sense if the interest rate is 6% or 4%?
Business
1 answer:
igomit [66]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1(a) PV for Sally if she goes to school = $38,322.00

1(b) PV for Sally if she does not go to school = $37,188.21

1(c) Since the present value for Sally if she goes to school of $38,322.00 is greater than the present value if she does of $37,188.21, the investment in school makes sense.

2(a) PV for Sally if she goes to school = $37,557.85

2(b) PV for Sally if she does not go to school = $36,667.85

2(c) Since the present value for Sally if she goes to school of $37,557.85 is greater than the present value if she does not of $36,667.85, the investment in school makes sense.

3(a) PV for Sally if she goes to school = $39,108.73

3(b) PV for Sally if she does not go to school = $36,667.85

3(c) Since the present value for Sally if she goes to school of $39,108.73 is greater than the present value if she does not of $37,721.89, the investment in school makes sense.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is provided before answering the question as follows:

Sally has a decision to make about what she will do in the next 2 years. She can go to school or go straight into the workforce. If Sally immediately starts working, she will earn $20,000 in both years 1 and 2. If she goes to school in year 1, she must pay $5,000, but she would earn $47,500 in year 2. If the interest rate is 5%, calculate the present value for Sally if she goes to school and if she does not. Does the investment in school make sense? Does it make sense if the interest rate is 6% or 4%?

The explanation of the answer is now provided in 3 parts as follows:

To calculate the present value of an amount, the following formula is used:

PV = FV / (1 + r)^n ………………. (1)

Where:

PV = present value of an amount

FV = Future value an amount in a particular year

r = interest rate

n = the year in focus

Therefore, we have:

1(a) If the interest rate is 5%, calculate the present value for Sally if she goes to school

Using equation (1), we have:

PV of amount to pay in Year 1 = $5,000 / (1 + 0.05)^1 = $4,761.90

PV of earnings in Year 2 = $47,500 / (1 + 0.05)^2 = $43,083.90

Present value for Sally if she goes to school = PV of earnings in Year 2 earnings - PV of amount to pay in Year 1 = $43,083.90 - $4,761.90 = $38,322.00

1(b) If the interest rate is 5%, calculate the present value for Sally if she does not go to school

Using equation (1), we have:

PV of Year 1 earnings = $20,000 / (1 + 0.05)^1 = $19,047.62

PV of Year 2 earnings = $20,000 / (1 + 0.05)^2 = $18,140.59

Present value for Sally if she does not go to school = PV of Year 1 earnings + PV of Year 2 earnings = $19,047.62 + $18,140.59 = $37,188.21

1(c.) Does the investment in school make sense?

From parts 1(a) and 1(b) above, since the present value for Sally if she goes to school of $38,322.00 is greater than the present value for Sally if she does not go to school of $37,188.21, the investment in school makes sense.

2(a) If the interest rate is 6%, calculate the present value for Sally if she goes to school

Using equation (1), we have:

PV of amount to pay in Year 1 = $5,000 / (1 + 0.06)^1 = $4,716.98

PV of earnings in Year 2 = $47,500 / (1 + 0.06)^2 = $42,274.83

Present value for Sally if she goes to school = PV of earnings in Year 2 earnings - PV of amount to pay in Year 1 = $42,274.83 - $4,716.98 = $37,557.85

2(b) If the interest rate is 6%, calculate the present value for Sally if she does not go to school

Using equation (1), we have:

PV of Year 1 earnings = $20,000 / (1 + 0.06)^1 = $18,867.92

PV of Year 2 earnings = $20,000 / (1 + 0.06)^2 = $17,799.93

Present value for Sally if she does not go to school = PV of Year 1 earnings + PV of Year 2 earnings = $18,867.92 + $17,799.93 = $36,667.85

2(c.) Does the investment in school make sense?

From parts 2(a) and 2(b) above, since the present value for Sally if she goes to school of $37,557.85 is greater than the present value for Sally if she does not go to school of $36,667.85, the investment in school makes sense.

3(a) If the interest rate is 4%, calculate the present value for Sally if she goes to school

Using equation (1), we have:

PV of amount to pay in Year 1 = $5,000 / (1 + 0.04)^1 = $4,807.69

PV of earnings in Year 2 = $47,500 / (1 + 0.4)^2 = $43,916.42

Present value for Sally if she goes to school = PV of earnings in Year 2 earnings - PV of amount to pay in Year 1 = $43,916.42 - $4,807.69 = $39,108.73

3(b) If the interest rate is 6%, calculate the present value for Sally if she does not go to school

Using equation (1), we have:

PV of Year 1 earnings = $20,000 / (1 + 0.04)^1 = $19,230.77

PV of Year 2 earnings = $20,000 / (1 + 0.04)^2 = $18,491.12

Present value for Sally if she does not go to school = PV of Year 1 earnings + PV of Year 2 earnings = $19,230.77 + $18,491.12 = $37,721.89

3(c.) Does the investment in school make sense?

From parts 3(a) and 3(b) above, since the present value for Sally if she goes to school of $39,108.73 is greater than the present value for Sally if she does not go to school of $37,721.89, the investment in school makes sense.

You might be interested in
Following information is given of ABC Ltd.
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
(25000x4) + (10000x6) = 260,000

260000- 150000 = 110000

6 years payback period
7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following statements is NOT true about lockout/tagout?
dlinn [17]
<span>Which of the following statements is NOT true about lockout/tagout?
D. Lockout/Tagout is to be used only in extreme cases of potential electrical hazard 
D is not true because you would use a lockout/tagout when applying electricity in a way that could be dangerous. Due to being able to use it whenever it could be dangerous, it is used more than just in extreme cases. 
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
a woman who was born and raised in a poor family becomes a regional supervisor for bank of america. she has experienced
Damm [24]

According to the functionalist theory, stratification is essential and unavoidable because it is required to persuade those who possess the requisite knowledge and abilities to choose jobs that are crucial to society.

According to the conflict theory, society is a dynamic system that is always undergoing change as a result of struggle for limited resources.

Max Weber, a German sociologist, devised the three-component theory of stratification, also referred to as Weberian stratification or the three class system, which used class, position, and party as different ideal types.

What is the pariah group? Meaning of Max Weber

19 (3): 313–318 History and Theory (1980) Abstract. In the scientific study of Judaism, the term "pariah" was first used by Max Weber, who described it as the voluntary separation of a people's religion and morals from their host society.

Learn more about functionalist theory here:

brainly.com/question/27181875

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
A(n) ____ is a professional communication that accompanies your résumé when you respond to a job advertisement or are simply int
Grace [21]
A cover letter is the professional communication .
6 0
3 years ago
Marigold Corp. has two divisions; Sporting Goods and Sports Gear. The sales mix is 65% for Sporting Goods and 35% for Sports Gea
Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

Break-even point (dollars)= $15,500,000

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

The sales mix is 65% for Sporting Goods and 35% for Sports Gear. Marigold incurs $5735000 in fixed costs.

The contribution margin ratio for Sporting Goods is 30%, while for Sports Gear it is 50%

<u>To calculate the break-even point in dollars, we need to use the following formula:</u>

Break-even point (dollars)= Total fixed costs / Weighted average contribution margin ratio

Break-even point (dollars)= 5,735,000 / (0.3*0.65 + 0.5*0.35)

Break-even point (dollars)= $15,500,000

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • On May 27, Hydro Clothing Inc. reacquired 75,000 shares of its common stock at $8 per share. On August 3, Hydro Clothing sold 54
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement describes an exonomic impact of this technological advance
    12·1 answer
  • Presented below is the trial balance of Novak Corporation at December 31, 2020. Debit Credit Cash $ 198,550 Sales $ 8,101,220 De
    14·1 answer
  • An unsecured bond, backed only by the well-respected name of the organization, is called a _________ bond.
    10·1 answer
  • You can continue to use your less efficient machine at a cost of $8,000 annually for the next 5 years. Alternatively, you can pu
    9·1 answer
  • Gebler Company sells a product for $ 70 per unit. Variable costs are $ 25 per​ unit, and fixed costs are $ 2 comma 500 per month
    8·1 answer
  • Mishoe Corporation has provided the following contribution format income statement. Assume that the following information is wit
    5·1 answer
  • If you don't meet a deadline at work, you could: *
    5·2 answers
  • In one​ survey, the highest number of responses came from entrepreneurs who said their idea for a business came from​ ________.
    5·1 answer
  • he process through which labor and management negotiate conditions of employment for union-represented workers is referred to as
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!