The supreme court ruled in Katz vs United States expands the fourth amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to cover electronic wiretaps.
Explanation:
Katz found guilty because of illegal gambling and the appellate court found that there was no physical intrusion into the phone booth and there was no need for warrant.
The supreme court uses a wiretap to intercept a private telephone conversation and was not a search for fourth amendment.
The majority opinion of Katz vs United States had overturned the court of appeals affirmation of the conviction.
The fourth amendment is the bill of rights of constitution that protects people from unlawful searches and occupation.
Answer: B. an employee can seek both civil and criminal remedies for violations of the Act by Federal Government employers.
Explanation: The Privacy Act of 1974 does not cover the private sector organizations,it was enacted specifically for Federal Government employees. This Act was enacted specifically to achieve the following;
Restrict access to private information of individuals, Right of Access to private information of individuals, Fairness in execution of Governmental function with regards to information sharing and the right for it to be amended.
