1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
3 years ago
10

Does Karl Marx believe the relationship between the two classes are friendly?

Social Studies
1 answer:
sveticcg [70]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

No, he didn't

Explanation:

Marx believed that the relationship between the lower class and upper class were exclusively beneficial for the upper class.

According to his perspective, Upper class owned the resources and employed the labors from the lower class. The profit that generated from that labor mostly will obtained by the upper class while the lower class obtain very little from it. On top of that, the sales of the product that created by the effort were mostly bought by the lower class citizens and trapped them in never ending cycle.

You might be interested in
Which statement best summarizes what the doctor is saying about child factory workers
aleksandr82 [10.1K]
Almost all of them opposed child labor in the factory.

According to them, exposing a child (which physique still hasn't fully developed yet) to the factory's environment will be very bad for the child's well being

hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
William goes to saddle up stables in the middle of the night when no one is around and takes five saddles. william's crime is
dezoksy [38]
William's crime is larceny.
There are different types of thefts, including robberies, larcenies, and burglaries. Robbery is when you steal someone's belongings using threats, without their consent, but with their knowledge. On the other hand, larceny occurs when you steal someone's belongings without them knowing, which is the case here with William and him stealing 5 saddles furtively. 
5 0
3 years ago
Magnetic potential energy depends on [mark all correct answers]
Artist 52 [7]
It depends on...
B. distance
C. orientation
5 0
3 years ago
List one possible way that we can increase the amount of food that is available .​
Rashid [163]

Answer:

make more

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Amelia Earhart, her flight engineer, and her
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these is NOT part of the Pledge of Allegiance to the Georgia flag? Question 9 options: Equality Justice Moderation Wisd
    12·2 answers
  • According to émile durkheim, religion is created by ________, and religious expressions represent ________.
    13·1 answer
  • (98 Points & Brainliest)
    13·1 answer
  • What are some of the jobs of a magistrate judge
    5·1 answer
  • how was the structure of the government different from the structure of the articles of confederation ?
    11·1 answer
  • Prior to industrialization, reproductive labor and<br> ____occurred at home.
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP PLEASEE ILL GIVE BRAINLESS
    6·1 answer
  • Do you think taxes are necessary?
    8·1 answer
  • Should members of the House and Senate be given term limits?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!