This can fit into the category of Hasty Generalization, this is, that you generalize with a lack of evidence or better,reasons as of to state that the trilogy of the Lord of The Rings isgood. It is good because it is good, if the first part is good, then all the trilogy is good.
Another option might be a fallacy called <em>ad populum </em> which takes place whenever you appeal to the public knowledge of something to prove it is true. In this case forexample, you could say: the reviews are giving this movie 5 stars, so this movie is good, because people like it.
it’s either b or d but i’m pretty sure it’s d
I, me, mine, my. These all apply to first person, or to someone's dialogue.
A direct quote should NEVER be long-winded and lengthy. You want to try to get the point across in a carefully selected short excerpt, not copy a large portion of someone else's work and insert it into your paper with a little bit of your own writing.
<span>#1) Form your ideas into a paragraph of at least five sentences. Make sure to include supporting evidence from the play.
Answer: I believe that the most important event from the play is the weird sisters predictions in the beginning of the play. The main reason being that this is what triggered the conflict and the ambition to be the King. In other words it was the beginning of his demise. If this event had not happened then the story would have played out in a completely different path.
<span>I hope it helps, Regards. </span></span>
