Repeated all the time and sometimes writ it down to help remember it
Answer:
A cross-sectional study
Explanation:
A cross-sectional study is an observational study type. In this study the researcher conduct study at a specific point of time. This study analyses the data that is collected from a population or a subset of the population sample.
It is also called a cross-sectional analysis or prevalence study or it is also called a transverse study. In this study, all variables are the same except one variable in the study. But this variable will be constant throughout the study.
This study can be conducted with a different organization. Thus in the above statement, the researcher used cross-sectional research in his study.
Even the experts can't agree on the total number of federal government agencies, commissions, and departments.
Most estimates suggest there are probably more than 2,000 of these. They each have an area of specialization — some much broader than others — but their duties often overlap, making administration more difficult. To complicate things even more, many agencies have counterparts at the state and local level. Its size, complexity, and overlapping responsibilities leave the federal bureaucracy open to constant attempts to reorganize and streamline.
Congress has the power to create, organize, and disband all federal agencies. Most of them are under the control of the President, although few of them actually have direct contact with the White House. So, the bureaucracy has two masters — Congress and the President. The bureaucracy generally falls into four broad types: Cabinet departments, government corporations, independent agencies, and regulatory commissions
The federalist papers wanted to present to the people how a strong central government would be useful to the people and the union and how it could protect them from both foreign and domestic threats. The anti-federalists opposed this and claimed that a strong federal government could easily become tyrannical and become just like the European ones. The founding documents thus tried to find a compromise between these two stances.
Answer: Consistency and Accuracy
Explanation:
Consistency tends to prove how reliable a test can be while to know it's validity we check how accurate it it is.
