Answer: Cost of goods sold = $62500
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales revenue = $183,000
Ending inventory = $12,600
Beginning inventory = $15,600
purchases = $64,000
purchases discounts = $4,000
purchase returns and allowances = $1,500
freight-in = $1,000
freight-out = $500
Cost of goods sold = Beginning inventory + purchases - purchases discounts - purchase returns and allowances + freight-in - Ending inventory
= $15,600 + $64,000 - $4,000 - $1,500 + $1,000 - $12,600
= $62500
Yes I would sacrifice potentially winning the state title. Using performance enhancing drugs is both morally wrong, and illegal. If my team was to win states I would want it to be because we deserved it, not because players were taking drugs. Not only that, but the players who took the drugs could be causing a lot of harm to their bodies, something that isn't worth a title.
i'm confused what your trying to say here?
Answer:the firm should increase price
Explanation:
From the question there is a shortage i.e Demand is greater than Supply, the firm should increase the price of the product which would induce suppliers to increase their supply.
The increase in price would lead to a movement along the demand curve with would in turn correct the disequilibrium.
Answer:
The answer is: D) Crimson’s dividends received deduction is $21,000
Explanation:
The dividends received deduction (DRD) allows a company that earns dividends from another company, to deduct those earnings (dividends) from its income tax.
The three tiers of possible deductions are:
- If the company owns ≤20% of the second company, it can deduct 70% of the dividends received.
- If the company owns ˃20% but ≤80% of the second company, it can deduct 80% of the dividends received.
- If the company owns ˃80% of the second company, it can deduct 100% of the dividends received.
Since Crimson owned 15% of the second company, then it can deduct 70% of the dividends it received, which equals $21,000 ($30,000 x 70%).
