There is so much government control on the grounds that dishonest organizations keep on ignoring their social obligation. There ought not be less government direction until the point when organizations are prepared to police themselves.
This implies they assess how their business operations may affect on individuals, the earth, and society. Furthermore, they take measures, for example, vitality sparing, squander partition or contracting individuals with an incapacity. The legislature advances CSR. It has a reasonable acquisition approach and intends to show others how its done.
Answer:
a) Absolute Value Inequality => Absolute(0 + y) < 2
b) -2 < y < 2
Which means, Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible.
Explanation:
<u><em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department.
</em></u>
<em>a) Absolute Value Equation:</em>
Absolute(0 + y) < 2
where y represent the location of the new house and 0 represents the location of the fire department.
Furthermore,
<em>Absolute(0 + y) < 2 = (0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is +ve. </em>
and
<em>Absolute(0+y) <2 = -(0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is -ve.
</em>
b) When (0 + y) is +ve,
we have, (0 + y) < 2.
<em>Solving for y and subtracting 0 from both sides. </em>
0-0 + y < 2 - 0
<em>y < 2</em>
and when (0 + y) is -ve,
<em>we have, - (0 + y) < 2.
</em>
Solving for y:
- 0 - y < 2
multiplying negative from both sides
<em>y > - 2</em>
<em>So, we have -2 < y < 2 </em>
<em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible. </em>
The answer to this question is "OUTCOME FAIRNESS". Such as in addition to compensation, the customers expect OUTCOME FAIRNESS. In other words, the customers expect fairness in terms of policies, rules, guidelines, and timeless of the complaint process. Therefore, the answer is the last item in the choices which is outcome fairness.
Answer:
Yield to maturity is 3.94%
Explanation:
Yield to maturity is the annual rate of return that an investor receives if a bond bond is held until the maturity.
Face value = F = $1,000
Coupon payment = $1,000 x 9% = $90/2 = $45 semiannually
Selling price = P = $1080
Number of payment = n = 10 years x 2 = 20
Yield to maturity = [ C + ( F - P ) / n ] / [ (F + P ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $45 + ( 1000 - 1080 ) / 20 ] / [ (1,000 + 1080 ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $45 - 4 ] / 1040 = $41 /1040 = 0.394 = 3.94%
Answer:
What is entirely true about this contract is:
The contract is a VALID contract but is also a VOIDABLE contract on the part of Larry but NOT on the part of Sprint.
Explanation:
As a minor, Larry (he was under the age of 18 when he signed the contract with Sprint) lacks the contractual capacity to enter into the contractual relationship with Sprint. But since he has signed the contract in exchange for the purchase of the cell phone, Larry can either honor the deal or void the contract. This is why the contract is said to be valid but voidable at Larry's behest. However, after Larry has turned 18, if he has not done anything to void the contract, then the contract with Sprint can no longer be voided.
