<h2>Answer and Explanation </h2>
The laws were intended to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their resistance in the Tea Party objection in response to variations in assessment by the British to the loss of dependent assets. In Great Britain, these laws were introduced as Coercive Actions.
Parliament assessed the colonists. The colonists didn't like assessment without description. The colonists held having objections facing charges which drive to the Boston Tea Party. The British desired the colonists to send England behind for all the tea that the colonists killed during the Boston Tea Party.
The Soviet Union had a command economy. So, option (c) is the correct answer.
<h3>Why did the Soviet Union consider to have a great command of the economy?</h3>
A command economy is one in which the central government has a considerable role in determining a country's resource availability and distribution.
In this scenario, the Soviet Union operated a command economy structure from the early twentieth century until the 1990s.
The government can use this command economy to tell businesses what things to create, how to allocate resources to residents, and so on.
Citizens' economic freedom is limited under this system since they have little control over the things they buy.
For more information on the economic command, refer below
brainly.com/question/32705
The <em><u>OTTOMAN EMPIRE</u></em> was a former empire that ruled parts of Asia, Africa and Europe between the late 1200s and 1922- its headquarters was located in the country now named Turkey.
Hope it helped you
