Hi! :)
Answer: A. They destroyed the South’s morale and captured its capital, forcing the South to surrender.
There were no specific routes, however, Sherman and Grant had targets and if they would be able to bring down their targets, it would be easier for them to take over.
They had destroyed many cities in the South so that they won’t be able to wage war because of the damages they had done in those cities.
Answer:
resulted in the birth of agriculture
The Commerce Clause serves a two-fold purpose: it is the direct source of the most important powers that the Federal Government exercises in peacetime, and, except for the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, it is the most important limitation imposed by the Constitution on the exercise of state power. The latter, restrictive operation of the clause was long the more important one from the point of view of the constitutional lawyer. Of the approximately 1400 cases that reached the Supreme Court under the clause prior to 1900, the overwhelming proportion stemmed from state legislation.663 The result was that, generally, the guiding lines in construction of the clause were initially laid down in the context of curbing state power rather than in that of its operation as a source of national power. The consequence of this historical progression was that the word “commerce” came to dominate the clause while the word “regulate” remained in the background. The so-called “constitutional revolution” of the 1930s, however, brought the latter word to its present prominence.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the second one, which has to do with the fact that this exchange led to the removal, and sometimes death, of the Natives, since the Europeans needed the land in order to serve their economic needs. </span></span>
