not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer: C) denomination
Explanation:
Denomination of Hinduism is defined as the trait in which different god and goddess are worshiped .People in this tradition welcome concept of other deities and allow celebration and practices of their groups. These are usually divided into four sections Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism and Smartism.
According to the question,Jay belongs to denomination of Hinduism section as he addresses concept of other religious groups and welcomes their practices as truth.
Other options are incorrect because cult , sect, faction and symbol are not the religious subgroup classification category for Jay, in terms of Hinduism .Thus, the correct option is option(C).
<span>A primary cause of change in mental status, particularly
confusion, in older adults is drug toxicity.</span>
<span>Drug toxicity occurs when a person has accumulated too much
of a drug in their bloodstream which results into adverse effects on the body.</span>
