For a triangle, there is a proven inequality<span> that states that</span><span>, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than or equal to the length of the remaining side
21 + 37 >= 15
58 >= 15
21 + 15 >= 37
36 >= 37
37 + 15 >= 21
52 >= 21
We can see that the second inequality doesn't comply, thus there is not such triangle.</span>
65754.6 because the 9 in the hundreds place bumps up the five in the tenths
Answer:
1. 5² is 25 yards
2. 7² is 49m
3. 8² is 64cm
4.draw a square, make one side 6 feet then do 6² which is 36feet
5. do the same thing then write 10 inches on one side and 10² is 100 inches.
6. 7x3= 21 ft
7. 5x4= 20 in.
8. 2x8= 16 yd
Step-by-step explanation:
common sense
Answer: 2x3 + 17x2 + 25x - 50
Step-by-step explanation: Just try to distribute it at every step as follows:
Step 1: Start with the following:
(a + b + c)(d + e)
Step 2: Distribute (d + e) to each of the term in the first parenthesis
a(d + e) + b(d + e) + c(d + e)
Step 3: Distribute d and e to each term:
(ad + ae) + (bd + be) + (cd + ce)
or ad + ae + bd + be + cd + ce without the parentheses.
Step 4: Finally, simplify.
Using the above you should be able to do the following
Step 1: (2x2 + 7x - 10)(x + 5)
Step 2: 2x2(x + 5) + 7x(x + 5) - 10(x + 5)
Step 3: 2x3 + 10x2 + 7x2 + 35x - 10x - 50
Step 4: 2x3 + 17x2 + 25x - 50
It means the system is inconsistent, which is another way to way, there's no solution, namely, both graphs do not intersect ever, and therefore there's no common point with such x,y pair for both.
