Well, the states are unable to protect the rights of the people. the existing national government lacks the power to perform essential functions.
Pax romana was a time of peace so the army was laid back at the time. the the crisis of the third century struck resulting in civil war, invasion, <span>plague and economic troubles. the empire nearly collasped from all of this.</span>
Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Really? lol he was born January 17, 1706, Boston, MA
Answer:
Option D.
Explanation:
Revolution, is the right answer.
In the context of the political science, a revolution is a major and comparatively unexpected change in political leadership and administrative system which takes place at the time when the population launches a series of revolts against the government, usually due to observed oppression or political inadequacy.
Revolution is the only similarity between France and the United States. For instance, both the nations were seeking freedom; the U.S. from the occupation of Great Britain and France wanted to eliminate monarchy from France.
