1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tems11 [23]
2 years ago
10

Explain the role of three state institutions that deal with human rights violation​

Law
1 answer:
rusak2 [61]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The three state institutions that deal with human rights violations are - CESCR or Economic, Social and Culture Rights, Humans Rights Committee (CCPR), Committee on the 'Elimination of Discrimination against Women' (CEDAW) and CAT or Committee against torture

You might be interested in
Which of the following is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications? a. Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney

Explanation:

Dues and subscriptions are professional expenses. They are tax-deductible subject to the 2% Adjusted Gross Income.

Professional subscriptions refer to any fees that the person may have to pay to get his business or profession registered with a "governing body" for which a license is required.

One cannot claim tax back on professional fees and subscriptions.

Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications.

4 0
3 years ago
Who ye voting for <br> Joe Biden<br> Donald Trump<br> you Answer you get 20 points
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Joe Biden

Explanation:

Dont like Donald trump!!!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
yall ever tried to then yo mom hit her and she gasp up right to him and shoot water screaming cheeto puff number 7. what would y
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

lm.f.ao what? Further explain

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper arti
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

3 0
2 years ago
How are the 18th and 21th Amendments to Constitution alike? and How are they different?
asambeis [7]

Answer: The 18th Amendment, prohibiting the manufacture, transportation and sale of intoxicating liquors.

Alike: The 21st Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed, repealing the 18th Amendment and ending the prohibition of alcohol in America.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does the term juvenile waiver refer to?
    7·2 answers
  • If you need to censor a woman's nipples but you DON'T need to censor a man's nipples, could you IN THEORY censor a woman's nippl
    15·2 answers
  • Limbic system disorders are possible explanations for criminal behavior under_theries?a.classical b.psychoanalytic c.criminal an
    15·1 answer
  • The State of Missoula has enacted a new election code designed to increase voter responsibility in the exercise of the franchise
    12·1 answer
  • What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof of
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a polling error?
    13·2 answers
  • Keisha committed a crime in New York, but the punishment for the crime is harsher in Georgia, so the prosecutor organizes her ca
    11·1 answer
  • What is the congressman a member of ?
    8·1 answer
  • 30 POINTS TIMER PLS HELP PLATO CIVIS
    12·1 answer
  • The constitution and its amendments expressly prohibit all of the following except.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!