1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cestrela7 [59]
3 years ago
11

2. What is the effect of the ""cancel culture"" actions on History? Is it socially responsible to remove unfavorable or sensitiv

e history?
History
1 answer:
Anna35 [415]3 years ago
3 0
Cancel culture hasn't taken a huge effect on history other than "canceling" figures such as Christopher Columbus. Multiple monuments have been toppled or graffitied on that represent the dark spots in history, such as confederate leaders, colonizers, etc. Though the context in history books have not changed as much. Removing history from the books is no the responsibility of cancel culture. Cancel culture could be a possible threat to learning true history and how we came to be. We must learn true history to not make the same mistakes we did in the past. History will repeat itself.
You might be interested in
After reading the passage what are 2-3 questions that came up for you while reading?
elixir [45]
Oh okie oh gosh lol lol
7 0
3 years ago
Why did Britain demand a change to its trade agreements with China during the age of imperialism?
Elanso [62]
Because Britain wanted to expand its manufactured goods market. In the eighteenth century, Britain traded English wool and Indian cotton for Chinese tea and textiles; however, when the Chinese demand weakened, Britain demanded other means of attracting trade with China. Britain realized it could make up the trade deficit with China by selling Indian opium into the Chinese market, making opium the most profitable and popular crop in world markets.
6 0
3 years ago
And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government, and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highne
gavmur [86]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. That the pretended power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament is illegal.

2. That the pretended power of dispensing with the laws, or the execution of law by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal.

3. That the commission for erecting the late court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious.

4. That levying money for or to the use of the crown by pretense of prerogative, without grant of parliament, for longer time or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal.

5. That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.

6. That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of parliament, is against law.

7. That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions, and as allowed by law.

8. That election of members of parliament ought to be free.

9. That the freedom of speech, and debates or proceedings in parliament, ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.

10. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

11. That jurors ought to be duly impaneled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders.

12. That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.

13. And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening, and preserving of the laws, parliament ought to be held frequently.                                                  

sry if its not the answer you were looking for. It worked for me but it might just be my thing sry again if its not

5 0
3 years ago
How did France change under napoleons rule
juin [17]

Answer:

The Napoleonic Code

Explanation:

Napoleon changed France by creating the Napoleonic Code, negotiating a long-term agreement with the Roman Catholic Church and reforming the tax and education systems. Though Napoleon's reign ended in 1815, his reforms lasted well beyond his time in office.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the invention of perspective necessary for artists to achieve realism in painting?
Misha Larkins [42]

Brunelleschi created perspective, it was important because it was never seen before and allowed artists to draw what their eyes could see

 

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened as a result of the slave uprisings
    10·1 answer
  • Who were Ferdinand and Isabella, and how did their marriage change Spain?
    7·2 answers
  • How did black codes maintain a social order similar to slavery?
    6·1 answer
  • Which best describes how the Great Migration affected Northern cities?
    14·1 answer
  • Read the passage from an argumentative essay
    9·1 answer
  • FOR ALL MY POINTS write an argumentative essay on why dog parks are "helpful or harmful"
    6·1 answer
  • Which Native American tribe was forcibly moved west from their ancestral lands in an affair called The Trail of Tears?
    15·1 answer
  • Qué es el renacimiento y cómo transformó este proceso la mentalidad del ser humano?
    9·1 answer
  • In which region of central America would it be most difficult to make a living from farming? why?
    14·1 answer
  • Britain wanted control over the ____ because it was the shortest naval route between ______ and _______
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!