They reflacted because they supported individual liberties
Answer:
you'd get your 1 cent that your entitled to
Explanation:
Because they don't have the right to take your 1 cent if you want it back but then again it depends on the tax
Answer: No it is not a legal for a 24-year-old to date a 39-year-old.
Explanation: it is not illegal because as long as they’re not under the age of 18.
Within the law, you are permitted to release the record to the husband, hence you should go ahead a give this information to the husband.
See the explanation below
<h3>The law behind the release of medical information.</h3>
According to the HIPAA Privacy Rule at 45 CFR 164.510(b)
"specifically permits covered entities to share information that is directly relevant to the involvement of a spouse".
However, as a professional, you are not supposed to release information of a patient to an unknown person, in such a case the patient must approve of this first before you go ahead to give it out.
Learn more about the HIPAA Privacy Rule here:
brainly.com/question/11069745
#SPJ1
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.
Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;
-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and
-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.
The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.
On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or
-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults
#SPJ4
