Answer:
consideration. capacity.
Explanation:
the legal ability to enter into a binding agreement. people suffering from mental illness, intoxicated persons, those under the age of majority do not have. capacity.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______
a) the Supreme Court will rarely strike down laws passed directly by voters through the initiative process
b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
c) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overturn state statutes
d) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to strike down sections of state constitutions
Answer: b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
Explanation:
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the anti-miscegenation statutes that outlawed interracial marriage, such as was the case in Virginia, unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Connecticut’s birth control law was unconstitutional because it infringed the Fourth and Fifth amendments
Answer:
a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.
Explanation:
Clandestine graves are of interest to forensic taphonomy because criminals try to hide evidence of their acts.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- The work of clandestine graves is to do forensic investigations. There will be many forensic investigation cases. Criminals try to escape from those investigations.
- So clandestine graves have many interests in investigating the forensic taphonomy. After investigating the event the witness should match the case of the incident. Using particular information the clandestine graves should investigate the incident. They have to make criminals tell the truth of the incident.
