Answer:
Those who defend the use of animals in research contend that nonhuman animals are enough like humans to make them scientifically adequate models of humans, but different enough to make it morally acceptable to experiment on them. In addition to the ethical objections to causing suffering to other sentient species, inherent issues with animal models including differences from humans in both size and physiology, genetic differences, and variations in biological targets limit the ability of data collected from an animal model to be translated to people.
<h2>
HOPE I HELP U</h2>
The fallacy used by the teacher is called the fallacy of false causality.
<h3>How is this fallacy established?</h3>
- The fallacy of false chance establishes a relation between two elements.
- This relationship is false and does not present any type of interaction.
The fallacy of false causality establishes two elements in a cause-and-effect relationship, however, this relationship is false.
This can be seen in the statement made by the professor, where he shows that the passage of planes is responsible for the hot weather. However, the increase in temperature is caused by weather factors that are not influenced by airplanes.
Therefore, there is no cause-and-effect relationship between the planes and the climate of the region, which shows that this statement is incorrect.
Learn more about fallacies:
brainly.com/question/1178948
#SPJ1
The answer is between 2-4 so two because the icu is the intensive care unit which is serious
Por lo tanto, los registros policiales no forman parte del sistema judicial, y no se presume que documentos como informes de arrestos o informes de delitos / incidentes que se guardan en los departamentos de policía estén abiertos al público como lo están los registros judiciales.
