1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nataly862011 [7]
2 years ago
7

Duck, an accrual basis corporation, sponsored a rock concert on December 29, 2020. Gross receipts were $300,000. The following e

xpenses were incurred and paid as indicated:
Expense Payment Date
Rental of coliseum $25,000 December 21, 2020
Cost of goods sold:
Food 30,000 December 30, 2020
Souvenirs 60,000 December 30, 2020
Performers 100,000 January 5, 2021
Cleaning the coliseum $10,000 February 1, 2021
Performers Cleaning the coliseum Because the coliseum was not scheduled to be used again until January 15, the company with which Duck had contracted did not perform the cleanup until January 8-10, 2020. a. Calculate Duck's net income from the concert for tax purposes for 2019. If an amount is zero, enter "0".
Gross receipts 300,000 ✓
Coliseum rental 25,000
Food 30,000
Souvenirs 60,000
Performers 100,000
a. Calculate Duck's net income from the concert for tax purposes for 2019. If an amount is zero, enter "0". Gross receipts 300,000 Less: Coliseum rental 25,000 Food 30,000 Souvenirs 60,000 Performers 100,000 Cleaning costs Total expenses 215,000 Net income for 2019 85,000
b. What is the true cost to Duck if it had to defer the $100,000 deduction for the performers until 2020? Assume a 5% discount rate and a 21% marginal tax rate in 2019 and 2020. The present value factor for a single sum at 5% for one year is 0.9524. If required, round your answers to the nearest dollar. The present value of the 2020 tax savings is and the cost of the deferral to Duckiss.
Business
1 answer:
m_a_m_a [10]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Duck Corporation

Rock Concert

a) Income Statement for the year ended December 31, 2020:

Gross receipts          $300,000

Less: Coliseum rental  25,000

Food                             30,000

Souvenirs                     60,000

Performers                 100,000

Total expenses          215,000

Net income for 2019  85,000

b) The true cost is $116,240.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Rental of coliseum $25,000 December 21, 2020

Cost of goods sold:

Food 30,000 December 30, 2020

Souvenirs 60,000 December 30, 2020

Performers 100,000 January 5, 2021

Cleaning the coliseum $10,000

b) The Cleaning expense is excluded because the services had not been rendered as at December 31.  The inclusion of the Performers' compensation is necessary because the services had been enjoyed and incurred as at December 31.

c)  The true cost = the Present value of the $100,000 performers' compensation plus additional tax expense of $21,000 ($100,000 * 21%) that would have been deducted.

= $116,240 ($95,240 + $21,000)

You might be interested in
Regina finds a new car costing $25,000 and a used car costing $17,000. Which car will have higher insurance premiums and why?
GaryK [48]
The used car will have higher insurance premiums because there is a higher chance that it will malfunction and that they will have to pay for your expenses. A new car is cheaper when it comes to premiums because it is expected to last and the insurance companies are safer in this regard.
3 0
3 years ago
You are interested in understanding how clicks lead to a sale on your site. what do you call a click that leads to a sale on you
blagie [28]
Answer: Clickthrough rate

Source and explanation: <span>https://goo.gl/EfAAxu</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Royal Lawncare Company produces and sells two packaged products—Weedban and Greengrow. Revenue and cost information relating to
slega [8]

Answer:

Contribution is sales revenue less variable cost. In multiple products environment, it is important that the producer have information about the performance of each product. This is useful for decision making purpose. See income statement below

Explanation:

An income statement showing contribution would suffice:

       Royal Lawrence Company

                                                                  Income statement

                                                      Weedban Greengrow Total

                                                                    $                   $                   $

Sales (sp/unit × unit)                            315,000   900,000         1,215,000

Variable cost (Vc/unit × units)              (<u>98,000)</u>      (<u>325,000)</u>  (<u>423,000)</u>

Contribution                                           217,000      575,000   792,000

Specific fixed cost                              <u>  (132,000)</u>   <u> (37,000) </u> <u>(169,000)</u>

Product profit                                   85,000     538,000   623,000

Common Fixed cost                                                     <u>(100,000)</u>

Total profit                                                                     <u>523,000 </u>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Karen and Al obtained a 30-year fixed-rate, fully amortized loan when they purchased their home. Which statement is true
murzikaleks [220]

Based on the information given regarding the mortgage, the true statement will be that each of their payments is for the same amount.

A fully amortized payment simply means a payment where the individual makes every payment according to the schedule of the loan.

A fully amortized payment is a periodic repayment of a debt. Since Karen and Al obtained a 30-year fixed-rate fully amortized loan when they purchased their home, they'll pay the same amount monthly.

Learn more about mortgage on:

brainly.com/question/1318711

5 0
2 years ago
Suppose two cities are considering tearing down their stadiums to build new ones. In one city, the old stadium cost $5 million t
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

These are the options for the question:

A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.

B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.

C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.

And this is the correct answer:

A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.

Explanation:

City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is the best example of clear and concise writing for a réesumé
    14·1 answer
  • The​ risk-free rate is 3.4​% and you believe that the​ S&amp;P 500's excess return will be 11.9​% over the next year. If you inv
    5·1 answer
  • Organizations are increasingly using teams for many reasons. The difference between a good team and an outstanding team has been
    14·1 answer
  • where cost is in dollars and time is in minutes. The cost of driving an automobile is $5.50 with a travel time of 21 minutes, wh
    15·2 answers
  • Red Eye Shipping Inc. has purchased a business intelligence system. The main advantage of such a system is that it eliminates th
    13·1 answer
  • How much money should typically be put into your emergency fund?
    9·1 answer
  • Using the income statement for Times Mirror and Glass Co., compute the following ratios:
    5·1 answer
  • Government purchases include government spending on.
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this?
    7·2 answers
  • Azzura is comparing different cars and believes that the sedan has a better mix of benefits in relation to price than the sports
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!