Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
Answer:
The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Percentage downsize in the workforce = 15% = 0.15
Cost of exit interviews = $100
Normal separation cost = $5,000
Now,
Total separation cost per employee = Cost of exit interviews + Normal separation cost
= $100 + $5,000
= $5,100
Therefore,
The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year
A regular outcome could be a lot of hate from co-workers and your boss, and eventually you might be put on admin leave or fired.
Answer:
A <u>increase</u> in the money supply will cause interest rates to decrease, which, in turn, causes spending to <u>increase.</u>
It’s depends which artical your reading since you have to re read the book to answer.