1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arte-miy333 [17]
3 years ago
12

Many people argue that due to widespread internet accessibility, libraries are not necessary anymore. Do you agree or disagree?

English
1 answer:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
8 0
To conclude the incline in the network penetration of cyberspace, the status of libraries will experience downfall as the internet provides a smooth flow of information, along with lesser damage to the environment. Numerous individuals assert that because of extensive internet availability, libraries have lost their significance. This essay agrees with this statement because firstly internet provides seamless information, and secondly, libraries are not environment friendly. So yes I agree
You might be interested in
Which of these is a compound sentence? (pls leave an explanation if possible)
aev [14]

Answer:

B. Dos Palos was is a small community, but the land was good for farming.

Explanation:

This is because it contains a conjunction, "but" which strings two sentences together.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Think back to the lesson about italics and quotation marks. Which of the following sentences is punctuated correctly?
allsm [11]
<span>We saw <em>The Hunger Games</em> this weekend, and we loved it!

This sentence uses italics correctly, if indeed the original question showed the title of the movie in italics. Essays should be in quotations, and the final sentence is missing the end quotation mark, so this is the only option of a correct answer if the title is italicized. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A day without Rules(Speech)​
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

Explanation:

Although sometimes we think the life without rules would have been quite good, because we could do anything we wanted, but you know, it’s not always true.

If we could do everything we wanted, the society would become uncivilized, like a jungle.

Sometimes we do things knowingly or unknowingly which hurt our family and society well being. This is why rules are required. Our actions and thoughts should have some limits. The human nature is very greedy and destructive. Life without rules won’t be good as humans will destroy life and the nature. Our life will be worse if we don’t adhere to some of the rules, which have been developed to drive us toward the right direction.

Rule Binds Human Nature:

ADVERTISEMENTS:

 

The human actions are driven by many factors. Our aim, perceptions or thoughts, believes and our nature is responsible for what we do. If the family raising a child is not good, it’s obvious that the influence of the family on the child’s overall upbringing won’t be good. In that case, the child will have negative personality and bad intentions. He/she will most likely do things which can hurt the others. If there is no rule to bind the actions of such people, they will create chaos in the society.

A Life without Rule:

Some of the rules of life are very important. They help us stay unite and maintain the balance of the society. For example, the rule of getting married has a deep significance. It makes us committed to a relationship. It teaches us to take responsibilities of a family. Simply put, this traditional social rule of being committed to a relationship actually makes us a responsible human being. The other intention of this life rule is to bind a man and woman into a serious relation where they will commit only to each other and not to anybody else.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

 

Life without rule can become seriously chaotic if a man or a woman fails to understand the importance of being civilized. Even after so many regulations and bindings, humans are threat to each other. I know that some orthodox rules sometime become the obstruction to human growth, but that you’ve to understand. If not adhering to a rule doesn’t harm the well being of others, life without rule of that kind is welcomed anytime. You have to understand when sticking to a rule is beneficial for the personal safety and the well being of the society.

Conclusion:

Not all rules are important for our safety and living. If the society tells you to follow the rules of racism or caste discrimination, you should raise voice against it. If your family and relatives force you to choose a career option saying that it’s a family rule, that’s rubbish. You really have to understand the fundamental logic supporting the rules. If life without rule makes yours and others life worse, it’s not good. On the contrary, if your parents say that waking up early in the morning is a rule, there are many scientifically proven reasons to support the habit. So, it’s not always true that life without rule would have been good. What I mean to say is try to understand every rule logically and then only decide to follow it.

4 0
3 years ago
What can be inferred about Master Hauchecorne from this passage? He is wealthy and influential. He is haughty and arrogant. He i
pychu [463]

What can be inferred about Master Hauchecorne from this passage? He is wealthy and influential. He is haughty and arrogant. He is learned and sophisticated. He is simple and unsophisticated
6 0
3 years ago
Which part in this excerpt from Theodore Dreiser’s “My Brother Paul” reflects Dreiser’s desire for acceptance?
sattari [20]

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "A. As I look back now on my life, I realize quite clearly that of all the members of my family, subsequent to my mother's death, the only one who truly understood me, or, better yet, sympathized with my intellectual and artistic point of view, was, strange as it may seem, this same Paul, my dearest brother."


Explanation:

Based on the given excerpts above from Theodore Dreiser’s “My Brother Paul”, the one that reflects Dreiser’s want for acceptance is possibility A. As I remember currently on my life, I understand quite clearly that of all the members of my family, succeeding my mother's death, the sole one who actually understood me, or, better yet, sympathized with my intellectual and creative purpose of read, was, strange because it could appear, this same Paul, my beloved brother.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How to know if a phrase is a adjective and a adverb phrase
    15·1 answer
  • Which phase best describes how Levi is characterized in this passage
    10·1 answer
  • How does orwell develop his message about those in power
    7·1 answer
  • You were recently on a school trip when something unusual happened.
    7·1 answer
  • Generalize why Winston is given regular meals, clothes and dental work
    9·1 answer
  • There are many hiking trails near our house. (Hiking)<br><br><br>Participle<br>Or<br>Gerund
    14·1 answer
  • If the results of the study are true, what strategy would you propose for naming hurricanes? Why?
    9·1 answer
  • Which sentence from “Competition Builds Better Dancers” BEST shows that dance
    15·1 answer
  • They should go to the USA
    12·1 answer
  • Help me please, I'll give brainlist
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!