Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
In this particular scenario, based on the numbers I would say that it does not make sense to represent this with a constant rate. That is because in a span of three years the change between each year is completely different, for example, between the first and second year there was a change of
9.75 - 8.50 = 1.25 dollar change
1.25 / 8.50 = 0.147 or a 14.7% increase
Between the second and third year, there was a change of
12 - 9.75 = 2.25 dollar change
2.25 / 9.75 = 0.23 or 23% increase
Therefore, each year the percent and dollar value increase is increasing more and more which would not be a constant rate.
Acute: anything less than 90 but greater than 0
so, m<CAD
right: angles at exactly 90 degrees, so m<AEC,
and obtuse angles are anything greater than 90 but less than 180 degrees,
so CDA (you can tell by the picture that it is bigger than 90- 90 degrees is exactly perpendicular)
Answer:
p=119
Step-by-step explanation:
A triangle has a total degree of 180. If you have two given points, add them together. In this case, those two points are equal to 61. Then, because one triangle is 180 degrees, subtract 61 from 180. You are left with 119 and that is your answer. Hope this helps :)
Check the formula of future value of annuity ordinary (through Google)
FVOA=100[((1+0.13/12)^(12)-1/(0.13/12)]
FVOA=1274.15
