Answer: Matched pairs design
Explanation:
A matched pairs design is a type of study used when 2 treaments are present in an experiment. The individuals in the design can be divided into pairs using a blocking variable, and each pair can then be allocated to treatments at random. This is thus a special type of randomized block design.
In this case the blocking variable can be the various urban areas as 1968 is matched against 1972. Each city can be compared based on 2 measurements. From their each individual can be grouped into pairs and allocated to different treatments.
Answer:
The incorrect statement is letter "B": Residents of Canada meet the definition as a qualifying person.
Explanation:
Credit for Other Dependent is a tax credit taxpayers can claim for every qualifying dependent that is not considered as a Child Tax Credit (17 years or older and elderly parents). The taxpayer can get up to $500 nonrefundable credit for each of those qualifying dependents. Residents of Canada and Mexico do not meet the definition of qualifying dependent.
Original Source Material
Student Version
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Several factors can contribute to long-term organizational success. One is the establishment of a core ideology that Collins and Porras (2002) describe as "core values and sense of purpose beyond just making money" (p. 48). Also, the importance of a visionary leader that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time is hard to over emphasize.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
This is not plagiarism.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Plagiarism in very simple words is the copying of the content of the document that has been written by some one else in to your own document. During this copying the due acknowledgement is also not given to the document from which it has been taken.
The document that has been talked about in the question above is not an example of plagiarism. The proof for this is the due acknowledgement given to the references from whose document the content has been taken into the document.
Answer:
$1,500
Explanation:
Investment interest expenses = Interest Income + Non qualifying dividends
Investment interest expenses = $500 + $1,000
Investment interest expenses = $1,500
$1,500 < $2,500 (Investment interest expenses)
The long term capital gains are not considered in investment income because this income is taxed at a preferential rate. Hence, the Investment interest expenses deduction for the year is $1,500.
Jack can face multiple risks.
He can be injured or killed in a car wreck.
He can injure or kill someone in a car wreck.
Bills.
Car note.
Gas Money
Tickets.
Parking.
Hope this helps Buddy!
- Courtney
