The right option is They outline reasons that support the claim that "it becomes necessary... to dissolve the political bands" with England. According to Thomas Jefferson, all men are born with the rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The state of things back then, with the mentioned political bands with England, were preventing the American colonies to achieve or fully enjoy such rights. First off, governments are instituted from the consent of the governed people; this is not possible under a king (kings, and particularly kings from European empires such as France and England, used to have absolute power and were despots). Then, in order to establish a new government which will set rules and regulations for the governed ones to abide by on the pretense that such regulations and rules aim at protecting and benefitting them (which is what national Constitutions are for), the people has a right to throw off a regime threatening their independent lives, liberties and pursuit of happiness. Lastly, it is stated that the present King of Great Britain does not respect the rights or self-determination of people living in any of the initial Thirteen United States of America and, according to Jefferson, seeks the establishment of an absolute Tyranny. All the above reasons led to the necessity of cutting bonds from Great Britain.
Some good ideas are blossom, parallel, taxi, carnivore, gift, and miscellaneous.
Upon his return home, Gulliver was sickened by the sight, touch, and smell of his family.
Because of his feelings towards his family, Gulliver distanced himself from them. He instead spent his time with the horses, trying to recreate the feeling he had when he was still in Houyhnhnmland.
Answer:
-Privacy issues between children and parents
-Should preventive immunization be optional?
-Do animal rights work in reality?
-Should children be allowed to use gadgets?
-Should beauty contests be banned?
-Are school uniforms beneficial?
-Is global climate change caused by humans?
-Is the death penalty effective?
-Is our election process fair?
those are just some ideas :)
The Tet offensive proved that not only did the Viet Cong have the desire to fight back, but also the ability. It killed many US soldiers and set the war strategies back a bit. This added deeper conflict and dread to American fighters as well as American civilians.
