Please answer question 4

Explain why ΔABC cannot be shown to be congruent to ΔCDA.

igomit [66]

There isn't enough info to prove the triangles to be congruent or not. So we can't say for sure either way.

We have angle CAD = angle ACB given by the arc markings, and we know that AC = AC due to the reflexive theorem. However we are missing one third piece of information.

That third piece of info could be....

AD = BC which allows us to use SAS
angle ACD = angle CAB which allows us to use ASA
angle ABC = angle CDA which allows us to use AAS (slight variation of ASA)

Since we don't know any of those three facts, we simply don't have enough information.

side note: If AB = CD, then this leads to SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem. If we had two congruent sides, the angle must be between the two sides, which is what AD = BC allows.

4 0

3 years ago

Circle the letter of the

laiz [17]

Step-by-step explanation:

the length of the third side could be 6

As in order to form a triangle The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side.

so Here

8 + 3 > 6

11 > 6 ( True) ✔

8+ 6 > 3

14 > 3 ( True) ✔

6 + 3 > 8

9 > 8 ( True) ✔

Hope it will help you :)

5 0

3 years ago

Need help please!!!!

ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Given : A inequality is given to us . The inequality is 19 ≥ t + 18 ≥ 11 .

To Find : The correct option between the given ones . To write the compound inequality with integers .

Solution : The given inequality to us is 19 ≥ t + 18 ≥ 11 . Let's simplify them seperately .

$\red{\tt Case\:1}$

⇒ 19 ≥ t + 18 .

⇒ t + 18 ≤ 19 .

⇒ t ≤ 19 - 18 .

⇒ t ≤ 1 = 1 ≥ t . ..................(i)

$\red{\tt Case\:2}$

⇒ t + 18 ≥ 11 .

⇒ t ≥ 11 - 18.

⇒ t ≥ -7 . ....................(ii)

On combing (i) & (ii) .

$\Large\boxed{\green{\bf \red{\longmapsto} 1 \geqslant t \geqslant -7 }}$

This means that t is less than or equal to 1 but greater than or equal to (-7) .

4 0

3 years ago

Rachel traveled to five different areas (A, B, C, D, and E) to study the number of buckeye butterflies and the number of monarch

Ivenika [448]

Answer:

As we can see our our ration in Area B and Area D gives the same answer, so they are in proportion

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that

Rachel traveled to 5 areas to find number of Buckeye and Monarch butterflies.

Areas Rachel Traveled to = A, B, C, D, E

The table given below shows her findings.

Area Buckeye Monarch

A 15 16

B 27 36

C 12 25

D 24 32

E 44 33

Now lets find the ratio of Buckeye and Monarch Butterflies in these areas

Area A

Buckeye : Monarch = 15:16 = 0.9375

Area B

Buckeye : Monarch = 27:36 = 0.75

Area C

Buckeye : Monarch = 12:25= 0.48

Area D

Buckeye : Monarch = 24:32 = 0.75

Area E

Buckeye : Monarch = 44:33 = 1.334

As we know that if two ratios give same answer after solving the fraction then these ratios are in proportion.

As we can see our our ration in Area B and Area D gives the same answer, so they are in proportion.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The intelligence quotient (iq) test scores for adults are normally distributed with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15

Mrrafil [7]

0.9818 is the answer

3 0

3 years ago