1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol [13]
3 years ago
15

Please hurry and thank you! :)

History
1 answer:
Nimfa-mama [501]3 years ago
6 0
Http://openstudy.com/updates/4f58bfaee4b0c9fd2d4bd591



1. Please complete this response in paragraph form. The native population of the Spanish colonies declined by as much as 90 percent between 1519 and 1605. Why did the native population deceline so dramatically? Include at least three reasons in your explanation. How did the Spanish government respond to the dramatic decline? My answer: The native population of the Spanish colonies declined by as much as 90 percent between 1519 and 1605 because disease, the lack of good, and poor treatment. When the Spanish colonists came to the Americas they brought measles, typhus, chicken pox, smallpox, mumps, and other diseases from Europe that the Indians had no resistance to. The diseases killed Indians rapidly and even decreased a native town's population from sixteen thousand, to a mere four hundred. The poor living spaces didn't help the situation either. Unaware of the consequences, the government drove the Indians from their spaced villages and made them live in towns. The result of less space made the epidemics kill more people since they lived so close to each other. If any Indian did live, there wasn't much time for them to recover and get all of their strength back. The Spanish colonists needed someone to work their fields, but with the limited amount of healthy and able-bodied workers a wave of hunger followed, which only made living even harder. The colonists would beat the Indians to force them to work their already energy drained bodies even harder, decreasing the ever-waning population of natives down even more. Once again, not thinking of the consequences the colonists made things worse. The colonists would chop down whole forests for lumber and firewood, leaving bare hillside sand fertile topsoil. When it would rain, the rich soil would be washed away, destroying any chance of using it. The colonists let their cows graze wherever they wanted, but the cows would eventually walk into the Indians' fields, destroying their hard work by trampling their corn and squash. With all of these negative things occurring, the native population was getting lower and lower every year at an alarming rate. Unfortunately, instead of seeing this as a problem, the Spanish government saw it as an opportunity. Their hunger for land was impossible to fulfill so they started to use sneaky tricks on the Indians to get more land. They would say that the Indians needed to show legal documents that entitled them to their land, knowing that before the colonists had come, the Indians would haven't thought of it. As they had suspected, the Indians didn't have the documents so the Spanish would take their lands away and combine a bunch of land into one huge one known as a hacienda. Having no other place to live and being very poor between the little money they made from farming and the taxes and fees the Indians had to pay, the Indians would move onto the haciendas. Eventually, the workers would become independent on the landlords and occasionally gain debts that locked them, and sometimes their children, to the estate for good.
You might be interested in
Jaela u here or nah answe
balu736 [363]
No.....................
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was an advantage held by the patriots during the revolutionary war?
Vilka [71]
One advantage held by the patriots during the revolutionary war was "<span>c. large manufacturing capacity," since the British had to ship in all of their supplies, which took a long time. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Please help me, remember no copying from the internet, and make sure their are 4-5 sentences.
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

Discrimination against people of color has been prominent for centuries in several countries. Today, there are widespread protests and riots for basic human rights, the death of George Floyd in 2020 sparked a revolution. Black children have a different type of "talk" with their parents then white children, its sad that at such a young age it is necessary for them to know that they might not be treated fairly simply because of the color of their skin. However, situations have admittedly improved, the widespread media coverage has allowed for a push in legislation supporting Black people. Therefore, the discrimation against Black people still persists today it is unfortunate that we as human beings can not look past the color of our skin.

5 0
3 years ago
What were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and National Republicans?
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
National Republican Party, U.S. political party formed after what had been the Republican (or Jeffersonian Republican) party split in 1825. The Jeffersonian Republicans had been the only national political party following the demise of the Federalists during the War of 1812. During the contested election of 1824, followers of Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams began calling themselves National Republicans, while backers of Andrew Jackson emerged as Democratic Republicans. By the election of 1828, the Jacksonians were simply called Democrats, though the name was not formalized until later. Opponents of Jackson joined the National Republican coalition and nominated Adams for a second term. Adams lost, but the National Republicans grew stronger. In 1831 they nominated Henry Clay to run on a platform endorsing the tariff, internal improvements, and the Bank of the United States.

Jackson and the Democrats won an overwhelming victory in the election of 1832, and the National Republicans never nominated another presidential candidate. During Jackson’s second administration, the National Republicans joined with northern and southern conservatives, supporters of the Bank of the United States, and other anti-Jackson groups to form a new coalition. Claiming Jackson governed as “King Andrew I,” the new party called itself the Whigs—after the British party that had opposed the power of the monarchy. By about 1834, there was little trace of the National Republican Party.

I hope this helped. If it did I suggest going onto a site called Quillbot.com. This particular site will take what I just wrote and paraphrase it, so it will look and sound like your work all along. Have a good day!!
6 0
3 years ago
The persecution of the Jews by Antiochus Epiphanes took place:
igomit [66]
The persecution of the Jews by Antiochus Epiphanes took place <span>in the Syrian period. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes Nicholas Copernicus's most famous contribution to science? A. He used mathematics to conclude that the
    12·2 answers
  • what physical features are shared by the countries on the arabian peninsula? select all that apply. arabian desert arid climate
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these ideas were influences of Judeo-Christian principles on government? Check all that apply.
    12·2 answers
  • What is the first step a company might take to eliminate competition
    8·1 answer
  • President Reagan’s nomination of Robert Bork to the US Supreme Court in 1987 was defeated largely because of fears in the senate
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Roman Empire fell
    8·1 answer
  • The population of Chicago is about 3,000,000. How does that compare to the total number of dead and wounded in World war 1 (Give
    15·1 answer
  • Interest groups actively work to make the Texans less informed about upcoming legislation.
    13·1 answer
  • Explain why there was a crisis over the Sudetenland
    10·1 answer
  • Which 20th-century media developments quickly became sources of
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!