<u>Answer:
</u>
The population of a city has decreased by 38% since it was last measured. If the current population is 27,900 .Previous population of city was 45000.
<u>
Solution:
</u>
Given that current population of city is 27900.
Also, population of a city has decreased by 38% since it was last measured.
Let assume that population of city when it was last measured = x
Decreased of 38% means x-38% of x . we can write this as,



So current population is 
Equating above expression to the given value of current population, we get


x=45000
Hence previous population of city was 45000.
The question is: If the student is known to be the girl (300 girls) what is the probability of being right handed.
We know that there are 300 girls, and that out of those 300, there are 250 girls right handed.
Divide 250 with 300
250/300 = 0.83333, or 83.33%
0.83333, or 83.33% is your answer
hope this helps
Answer:
Decimal: 0.375 Percent: 37.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
If you calculate SLE to be $25,000 and that there will be one occurrence every four years (ARO), then the ALE is $40,000.
<h3>What is Single-loss expectancy (SLE)?</h3>
A expected monetary decline each moment an asset is at risk is referred to as single-loss expectancy (SLE). It is a term that is most frequently used during risk analysis and attempts to assign a monetary value to each individual threat.
Quantitative risk analysis predicts the likelihood of certain risk outcomes as well as their approximate monetary cost using relevant, verifiable data.
IT professionals must consider a wide range of risks, including the following:
- Errors caused by humans
- Cyber attacks, unauthorised data disclosure, or data misuse are examples of hostile action.
- Errors in application
- System or network failures
- Physical harm caused by fire, natural disasters, or vandalism.
To know more about the Single-loss expectancy (SLE), here
brainly.com/question/14587600
#SPJ4
Both exponential i.e 5 ^x
A is true, surprisingly.
B cannot be true, it alternates.(rule of indices negatives by positive exponent = positive, negative by negative , but -5 x -5 x -5 = + 5)
I'm only imaginging, but C must be right, since it increases exponentially, as opposed to D which only increases quadratically.