Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>
It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.
In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103
100 times as bigger because it is in the 109s
I would say that your answer is 22
Answer:
T = 49
Step-by-step explanation:
T = w - ma
w = 85
m = 12
a = 3
Plug in the corresponding numbers to the corresponding variables:
T = (85) - (12) * (3)
Remember to follow PEMDAS. PEMDAS is the order of operations, and stands for:
Parenthesis
Exponents (& Roots)
Multiplications
Divisions
Additions
Subtractions
First, multiply, then subtract:
T = 85 - (12 * 3)
T = 85 - 36
T = 49
T = 49 is your answer.
~
5x=25
Because negative 3y and positive 3y got cancelled
