1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
3 years ago
15

Why did Progressive refromers of the early 1900s frequently attack political machines?

History
1 answer:
inysia [295]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The machines accepted bribes in return for favors.

Explanation:

A political machine was a system of unequal personal relationships in political apparatuses between influential people and their "clients", that is, those people who benefited from their relationship with politicians in exchange for bribes and other illegitimate practices. Thus, these types of organizations functioned unofficially through the assignment of positions through clientelism, behind-the-scenes control and lasting political ties within the framework of representative democracy.  Some machines had a "boss", who was a renowned politician, and all machines have a group of people who depend on the protection of the machine in the form of contracts or jobs.

You might be interested in
What did the Treaty of New York, Treaty of Fort Jackson, and Treaty of Indian Springs have in common? The Creeks gave up land in
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

The Creeks gave up land in exchange for money and protection, but the US government did little to stop settlers from pushing west.

Explanation:

The fight for land and belonging has been a constant source of discontentment between the Native Indians and the American government. The Creeks were one such native people who, like every other Native Indian, had to suffer at the hands of the United States government and try to find peaceful ways for them to have their own reservations.

But while there are numerous wars fought between the two, there are also numerous treaties signed to try to maintain peace and cordial relations. The <u>Treaty of New York (1790), the Treaty of Fort Jackson (1814), and the Treaty of Indian Springs (1825)</u> were some of the treaties signed between the two parties. And<u> one common factor of these treaties is that the Creeks were made to cede their lands in exchange for some money and protection from the government</u>. But while the Native Indians kept their part of the agreement, the<u> U. S. Government did not do much to keep their part and did not stop the flow of settlers</u> in the areas of the Native Indians.  

6 0
3 years ago
When does the plague reach paris and how many people die
love history [14]

The plague killed a third of the inhabitants

The plague reached Paris through Normandy in August 1348. It developed in the city, changed, reach a last peak of mortality in 1349 before a sudden decline. It is estimated that there was around 200 000 inhabitants at that time.

5 0
3 years ago
The argument presented in the excerpt from the Sumner’s speech has the most in common with which of these situations?
balu736 [363]

Hello!

I think you are missing the situations, but if are the following:

A) the passage of the Fugitive Slave act of 1850

B) ...

 C) ...

D) the argument against the expansion of slavery in the Wilmot Proviso of 1848

Then, the answer is D. the argument against the expansion of slavery in the Wilmot Proviso of 1848

Hope this helps :)

3 0
3 years ago
9. During the bargaining at Potsdam, why did the United States want free trade?​
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

Free trade increases prosperity for Americans—and the citizens of all participating nations—by allowing consumers to buy more, better-quality products at lower costs. It drives economic growth, enhanced efficiency, increased innovation, and the greater fairness that accompanies a rules-based system.

Explanation:

Free trade is a trade policy that does not restrict imports or exports. It can also be understood as the free market idea applied to international trade. In government, free trade is predominantly advocated by political parties that hold liberal economic positions while economically left-wing and nationalist political parties generally support protectionism, the opposite of free trade.

3 0
3 years ago
Thomas malthus theory on population growth and david ricardo's views on wages both agreed that...
Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

Thomas Malthus Theory of Population Growth and David Richardo's views on wages both agreed that food production increases as population increases, however, that the increase in population will overwhelm the abundance of food, and thus lead to diminishing returns. Both men believed in the principle of political economy. Both argued that there was a need to control the population in a time of abundance. They believed that if the population is not well managed, the abundance may be misused, and thus, the increased population will bear the brunt of the mismanagement.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is declaring faith the first of five pillars of islam
    6·1 answer
  • What type of small animal did tribes in the Great Basin region hunt?
    15·2 answers
  • The roots of Hinduism are found in the _____ religion.
    9·2 answers
  • How did ancient American Indian cultures use Clovis and Folsom points?
    15·1 answer
  • How does Roosevelt use of the big stick metaphor in the paragraph on pages five through six impacted speech
    15·1 answer
  • Some talk to me I’m bored
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best completes the diagram?
    7·2 answers
  • If you apply for a patent for a new invention, this application is evaluated for approval by A.State governors. B. the Departmen
    10·1 answer
  • What was the environment like in the Arabian coastal plain?
    12·1 answer
  • Following the American Revolution, the next successful revolution in the Americas took place in
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!