It depends on which way it goes. If the supply increases and prices stay the same, the disposable income increases in a meaningful way. That condition will cause the Fed either to raise interest rates, or the price of goods will respond to the increased demand or a third alternative could be that manufacturers will increase production (not very likely but it could happen).
If the supply of money decreases (by people being laid off for example) then the opposite of all the events listed above will or can occur. The fed could become more accommodating and lower interest rates. The price of good will decrease unless manufacturers increase their inventory (which not really healthy for an economy) or they could decrease production which will further decrease the labor force which will put the economy in an endless vicious cycle -- one no one wants.
Answer:
profit.
Explanation: its just right
Comparing the life of a company president or ceo with a dishwasher or taxi driver shows us glaring examples of social inequality.
<h3>What exactly is socioeconomic inequality?</h3>
Social inequality is defined as a scenario in which certain citizens of a country, a region, a section of the world, or both, are disparately or disadvantaged from others who are unfairly privileged. Logically speaking, it is the polar opposite of social equality.
Modern civilizations struggle with social inequality, which is a result of the uneven development of different parts of the world and the imposition of particular ideologies or human value judgments on some people over others. In fact, social inequality is the root of discrimination, which is the practice of treating individuals who are weaker than others in terms of their morals, social standing, or economic standing differently.
To know more about social inequality visit:
brainly.com/question/27164458
#SPJ4
