The owners of the property claimed the city had violated the Fifth Amendment's takings clause, which forbade the government from seizing private property without just compensation for public use.
<h3>What was the central tenet in Kelo v. City of New London?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court concluded in Kelo v. City of New London that New London could acquire privately owned lands for private development as part of its economic revitalization strategy.
The rationality of this project was The property owners contended that the city had violated the Amendment's takings provision, which guarantees that the government will not take private property for public use without just compensation.
Learn more about Kelo v. City of New London:
brainly.com/question/10992257
#SPJ1
Answer:
Rousseau believe that people should agree with the rules that they live by. The belief in progress is the belief in discovering new things. :)
Jungles maybe not quite sure
Antietam was fought on <span>September 17, 1862 and it</span> was the Battle that proved to be the bloodiest day in American history. 23,000 casualties in only 12 hours.
Answer:
A surplus of goods, like a more reliable food supply, allows for the development of more pronounced inequality in a society. This helps explain why the transition to a(n) <u>agrarian </u>society introduced much more inequality than the primary type of society that preceded
Explanation:
The agrarian introduced much more inequality because of the few owners that control the lands and the workers. Before agrarian society people would hunt and gathered but there was no owners that would control lands and the amount of money to pay to the workers.