B false obviously c'mon man you have to know this
Answer:
Check below for explanations
Explanation:
A legal rule is one made and enforced by social or governmental organizations to guide and regulate the conduct of the people in a society while ethical responsibilities are morally based obligations that individuals and groups have towards each other, and their abilities to interpret and act upon these ethical standards.
Ethical standards are not the bases for forming legal rules and vice-versa. Some conducts may conform to legal standards but may not uphold the ethical principles of a particular society. Some legal requirements are not ethically required and some ethical requirements are also not necessarily supported by law. This makes legal rules insufficient for fulfilling ethical responsibilities.
A cosmetic company using a popular drug addict, who also is a musician as a brand ambassador does not break any legal rules but fails in their ethical responsibilities. This is because this act can promote the rate of drug addiction among young people.
The slave trade was legal in Europe in the mid seventeen century, but this out-rightly opposes ethical standards because the people that were traded as slaves during these periods were not made to enjoy their human right. This was legal because it was accepted by the European governments.
For the amount of soldiers on each side I think
The Catholics and Methodists
Hope this helps!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
