Answer:
B. Provides a way to influence the court when expert testimony is not allowed
Explanation:
Amicus Curiae briefs are filed by the people who have interest in the subject matter of the lawsuit but they are not party to the litigation. Amicus curae means "friend of the court" briefs. It helps to provide sympathetic advocate to address policy issues and expand the effects of a potentially important prior court opinion
Filing of amicus brief signals the court that the case is important and related to many issues apart form the litigants interests. e.g An amicus curae about public health speaks a lot about the health significance of the policies at stake.
According to the Act, a summary conviction carries a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a potential sentence of six months in jail if the person commits copyright infringement for the first time.
<h3>
How hard is it to sue for copyright infringement?</h3>
It's a challenging process, especially for independent contractors and small business owners. Even while the copyright violation may be emotionally upsetting, you should also take your financial losses into account.
According to the Copyright Act, criminal proceedings may be brought if the infringement is very severe. According to the Act, a summary conviction has a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a maximum sentence of six months in jail, whereas an indictment-based conviction carries a maximum fine of $1 million and/or a maximum sentence of five years in jail.
Learn more about Copyright Infringement here:
brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ4
Answer:
This concept is used by European countries.
Explanation:
The concept of Victimhood adopted by the European countries especially United States of America to invade Afghanistan and control the Asian region. The 9/11 incident is caused by the America itself to get a sympathy vote and a reason just like the incident of pearl harbor to invade Afghanistan to control the region. The main aim of these European countries to control the spreading of communism and not to control the terrorist so this Victimhood helps many countries to get their goals.
Answer:
3 basic rights.
1.Religious freedom
2. Freedom of speach
3. Freedom of the press
Explanation:
All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.
The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.
"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>
<em />
The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?
The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.
Answer:
Yes as an investigaiter uderstanding Agathas motive would be important because she coud be getting the water cause she is realy be thirsty or she could be getting it to taget Eric by using the water excuse used to spy on him so hearing her motive would help me put as an investigator.
AS a jury it would be important to hear Agatha´s motive because I can hear why she was trespasing to get the water because she could be dehydrated and need the water. For a jury to hear her story would make to choose the choice of guilty or inicent and alos so she gets a chance to speak for herself then from what a investigator found.
