I do not believe the sentences are fair. Both defendants have committed aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a first degree felony capable of 5-99 year prison sentences.
The sentencing may differ based on each of the defendants’ criminal history. Past criminal offenses can effect the sentencing of a defendant. The reason being, the potential for the individual to commit future crimes.
Another reason could be it would be easier to prove that the robbery of the gas station was premeditated because it’s an establishment. Premeditation can increase sentencing because the crime was planned out and there is more room for internal moral questioning regarding the crime.
The difference here in sentencing could also simply be the gender of the defendant. Throughout history women have received more lenient sentencing for crimes compared to their male counterparts. Gender shouldn’t effect the sentencing of a criminal due to the lack of logical basis. Lastly the the items that were stolen may have made a difference. Debra only stole cash totaling $450. However, Jonathan stole $400 cash and an undisclosed value of lottery tickets. With that being said, the value of the lottery tickets could’ve greatly surpassed Debra’s value total. Not to mention he stole two forms of personal property while Debra stole one. The value and amount of stolen property should effect sentencing because stolen property valuing over a specific dollar amount can determine whether or not the defendant will be charged with a felony.
Answer:
B. Every 10 years after the census.
Explanation:
Gerrymandering occurs every 10 years and is going to be occurring this year after the 2020 election and census
Answer:
The simple answer is yes a female should be paid the same, but often this is not the case.
Explanation:
Morally, yes a female with the same qualifications and experience should be paid the same salary as the counterpart prior to her, though it is not a law that there can't be a wage gap between women and men and this is most commonly not a reality. Women are often paid less than men with the same degree, qualifications, and experience, especially if the woman is part of a racial minority, or in a male dominated industry. Often, employers are able to find loopholes and reasons, "justifying" this unjust wage gap.
Answer:
true. they can be charged with Vehicular Manslaughter
Answer:
Example I: A Californian who owns a computer store, who wants to relocate to Virginia has the same rights of commerce that apply to a Virginian.
Example 2: A citizen of California is protected under the data privacy act, which restricts sharing personal data. If he moves to Washington state, which enacted the same law, he will have the same protection that a Washington citizen enjoys.
Explanation:
The privileges and immunities clause protects the individual right of a citizen of any state to enjoy the same privileges that a free citizen of another state possesses. This law was specifically designed to protect any person from losing his freedom to pursue and ultimately obtain happiness and federal protection. The examples above show that a citizen who wishes to relocate to another state in one state is entitled to the same privileges of a citizen of that state, including protection or restrictions under state laws.