Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
For the sake of clarity, assuming you meant:
1) Absolute Value or Modulus functions has one property that assures us that:
2) Solving for x
Not defined in Real Set of Numbers
Evaluating 
:
3) So, since for the first case the Discriminant Δ <0, then the solutions presented for 
. The only solution in the Real Set for the inequality is 
, i.e. x=-1.
Well if 5+5=10 adding 1 would give you 11. Or you could do 6+6=12 and then subtract 1. Both 5+5 and 6+6 are doubles facts.
Answer:
The correct option is;
Yes, the line should be perpendicular to one of the rectangular faces
Step-by-step explanation:
A perpendicular cross-section of a triangular prism resting on a rectangular face will have a triangular cross-section section an either side of the line of the cross-section, therefore we have;
Given that the triangular prism is lying on one of the rectangular faces, the perpendicular cross-section will be represented by a line drawn along the slant height of the triangular prism, therefore the correct option is yes, the line should be perpendicular to one of the rectangular faces.
I figured out the first question, the second one in lost on.
Factor both of the equations, numerator and denominator
Cancel the like factors *excuse the zero im just showing you*
Combine frunctions
x-9=0
x+7=0
Restrictions are 9 and -7
Answer:
i believe that all of them are right, if they are not please correct me
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>m= y= 2x +4 </em>
<em>p= y= 1x- 1</em>
<em>n= y= -4x </em>
<em>L= y= 0x+ 4</em>
hope this helps!
