Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Military geography, adopted in the territorial knowledge of war areas, begins to be rescued by academic circles.
They used geography of the countries in the favor of their side, so was important to know the geography because if helped them to win some fights, because of this knowledge.
Answer:
Definition of the situation
Explanation:
Definition of the situation means that we analyze a social context in which we find ourselves, determine what is in our best interest, and adjust our attitudes and actions accordingly.
This simply put is decribing that at every point we find ourselves, we try to find out what will be beneficial to us in the situation, then we end up adjusting our attitudes and actions to suit the situation as it is in our best interest.
Defining a situation helps one not to be caught unawares in any given situation.
After the French-Indian War, an Ottawa chief named Pontiac<span> went to other Indians along the Ohio River Valley to start a </span>rebellion <span>because the British traders were on the land where the Indians lived.</span>
